If its only for personal use fine (ie not too high usage), but unless
you are printing on stupidly expensive paper you need to get fairly
close to notice the difference.
So if its for other people to judge the quality of your work from, you
consider the comparatively crap output from a colour laser to be
adequate. Nuff said!
So if its for other people to judge the quality of your work from, you
consider the comparatively crap output from a colour laser to be
adequate. Nuff said!
It depends what you are trying to do, personally with property details
with several photographs if I were to attempt to output on fancy glossy
inkjet paper it would be rather expensive. Most of my output is
therefore thrown away by members of the public and output from a laser
on plain paper tends to be better than inkjet output on the same paper.
It depends what you are trying to do, personally with property details
with several photographs if I were to attempt to output on fancy glossy
inkjet paper it would be rather expensive. Most of my output is
therefore thrown away by members of the public and output from a laser
on plain paper tends to be better than inkjet output on the same paper.
In conclusion then, the colour laser output is adequate for disposable
prints where quality has secondary importance to cost. I would probably
agree with that, but most of my output demands better quality than any
current colour laser can offer - which is why I have the inkjet for that
work.
