D
Dan C
What if hellman's designed the squeeze bottle so that it was impossible
to use more than half the mayonnaise? -Dave
I'd imagine that everyone would buy Kraft instead.
What if hellman's designed the squeeze bottle so that it was impossible
to use more than half the mayonnaise? -Dave
JAD said:oh i see... not the ink monitor, a part of the driver, but the
PRINTERS ink lite.
If an ink cartridge says "1000 sheets at 5%" then it should provide 1000
sheets at 5% coverage. Once it does that it can shut off/etc. even if it's
still half full. It met it's requirements.
Exactly what I plan on doing!Dan said:I'd imagine that everyone would buy Kraft instead.
Wow! I did see a site where a guy was trying to decode the chip to reset it
and discovered there was more info than just the "out of ink" code stored.
I bet this BS was what he saw!!!
It doesn't though - just like the HP cartridges I buy it specifies a volume
of liquid.
No printer mfr specifies such hard and fast limits on number of sheets...
except apparently Epson?? There's always a rider on such statements that
they are simply a guide to toner/ink consumption *rates*. It's quite clear
from this discussion that the majority believe they are buying a certain
*volume* of ink in a cartridge; if Epson wants to change that they are
apparently on an steep uphill slope.
Absurd analogy. In fact the way tire use really works, it's a good
comparison with ink cartridges as far how it should work. IOW if you drive
moderately, you can expect your tires to last longer than if you drive
hard.
You can't control how hard you drive your printer...
I'm not sure what you mean by that reply.Nope, all the Canon engines are based on multiples of 600.
Only Epson has multiples of 720.
Actually the number of nozzles do make a difference.The number of nozzles is also greater in the Epson,
though it really doesn't make the print any better.
As a matter of fact they did.Do you REALLY think Canon would produce something
for another vendor that would allow that other
vendor to claim better numbers than Canon could??
Don't recall exactly when my canon BJC-8200 came out but it doesn't exibit
any of that grainy mess the earlier bubble jets had. It looks as good on
photo paper as the epson prints I've seen and I'm printing from 30MB down
sampled scans (the original scans are over 300MB) from 4X5 transparencies
so I'm pretty picky about the output.
I looked at canon's site and none of their printers match epsons numbers,
they are now at 4800X1200 for most of their better (over $99) printers.
Maybe at one point they did this but I don't recall it and as I said my
BJC-8200 from just a few years ago makes really nice prints and isn't an
epson clone.
I looked at canon's site and none of their printers match epsons numbers,
they are now at 4800X1200 for most of their better (over $99) printers.
Maybe at one point they did this but I don't recall it and as I said my
BJC-8200 from just a few years ago makes really nice prints and isn't an
epson clone.
Stacey said:BTW abcink.com has a chip resetter that is about the cost of one color
cartridge. I'll bet the way I'm printing (B&W draft quality) I'll reset
those color ones 4-5 times at least before they are really empty..
I was gonna do that, but linuxprinting.org strongly recommended not to,
since Canons almost always don't work on Linux (or so they said...).
Stacey said:Noozer wrote:
Sure you can. What do you think "draft quality" or "glossy paper photo
quality" is doing? It's laying down less or more ink.
With the linux driver
I'm using, I can adjust the gama of the print as light as I want to use as
little ink per page as I want. But epson has decided that even if I use
less ink per page, I still am only allowed so many pages before I send them
some more money.
BTW abcink.com has a chip resetter that is about the cost of one color
cartridge. I'll bet the way I'm printing (B&W draft quality) I'll reset
those color ones 4-5 times at least before they are really empty..
Noozer said:But it's not working the printer any more or less harder as one would do
with tires.
No, they've decided that you use so many droplets of ink before they
cartridge could be at the point of causing an air bubble to gum up the
printhead.
Printing in draft should let you print a lot more pages than printing in
normal mode.
If it's not, then your printer is defective,
Kevin said:I was gonna do that, but linuxprinting.org strongly recommended not to,
since Canons almost always don't work on Linux (or so they said...).
*sigh* Where's some real info on what's compatible and what's not?
to how they worked with windows. For printing documents they work fine. I
read HP's work really good with linux and HP supports linux with drivers.
http://hpinkjet.sourceforge.net/
You can't control how hard you drive your printer...
...and you can drive on your tires until their on the steel belts, and you
lose control and crash.
I assume that you don't change your brake pads until the rivets are cutting
into the rotors as well.. To hell with the safety margin! Who cares if
they're squealing as long as there is some pad left!