I have always been confused about the use of the term "back up." Boot
disks provided with new computers seemed to make system back-ups
redundant, even though nearly everyone I know has at least two copies
of boot disks in addition to the factory manufacturer's. I could never
understand this.
As far as mirror-image personalized back ups are concerned, I was told
yesterday by two IBM customer service/tech support/(maybe both)
representatives that I have to download a huge file called Rescue and
Recovery onto my teentsie-weentsie 20G HD in order to make mirror
images.
I asked if the Windows-based HD back up "service," on the hardware
maintenance file (with Error Checking and Defrag) wouldn't provide a
mirror image. They both said No.
But I made one anyway, onto an external HD. At the end of this back
up, a message came up saying that unless I created a floppy disk, the
process was useless/worthless.
So 1) DO you need additional software to make mirror image back-ups?
2) Do you also need to create the back up on a floppy disk (or CD)?
Thank you.
mutefan:
I guess the above is your original query, yes?
I notice quite a number of responses to your query but I'm not certain
whether the rather conflicting information provided has provided you with
the information you're seeking.
When all is said & done I take it (like many PC users) what you're really
interested in is a reliable and effective backup system. So that in the
event of the failure of your day-to-day working HD for one reason or
another, you will have at hand a working, bootable copy of that HD. Isn't
that your basic objective?
If it is...
Then you should give serious consideration to employing a disk imaging
program, e.g., Symantec's Norton Ghost, Acronis True Image, etc. to
*directly* clone the contents of your working HD to another HD, either
internal or external. The process is simple, straightforward, reasonably
quick, and most of all - effective. There is nothing mysterious or exotic
about this process. By directly cloning the contents of your working HD to
another HD, you will have (for all practical purposes) a duplicate of your
source disk including the OS, all your programs and created data - in short,
everything that's on your source drive. What could be better for restoration
purposes and a near-failsafe backup system?
If your destination drive - the recipient of the clone - is another internal
HD, then that drive will be bootable. If the recipient of the clone is a
USB/Firewire external HD, it will not be bootable, but you can clone back
the contents of that external HD to the internal HD for restoration
purposes.
The program I generally use is the Ghost one - the 2003 version which I
prefer over the later Symantec versions 9 & 10 because I find it simpler to
use and just as effective in an XP environment. I've been using that version
of the Ghost program for the past four years and have probably undertaken
close to a thousand cloning operations with it. I've also been using the
Acronis program as of late - the version 8 and now the version 9 program and
I find that program quite effective as well.
Anna