dymanic route table problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Brian E
  • Start date Start date
Yea, I think I vaguely remember something about that now,...but I'm sure I'd
get a head ache if I worried about it too much.

--
Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
www.wandtv.com


Well I am not exactly sure what the real definition is, but the problem
above was solved by the network guys I work with.
In this instance the when the local 2000 system sent packet to the router to
get to 198.182, the router is smart enough to tell the OS that it lives on
the subnet that has the gateway for this ip, so go there.
OS-167.127.101.? going to 198.182.130.?-router has static entry for
198.182.130.0/24 out 167.126.101.101, so instead of actually handling the
routing it is telling the OS go to 101.101 since you live closer.
Hence the reason all of these systems on the 101 subnet have entries in
their route tables.
It is a type of redirect, cisco may call it some thing else.
Hi Kurt!

What is this "ip redirect"? This is the second time I've heard it mentioned,
but I went through all the Cisco CCNA when I got the Cert and never heard
anything about this. What is it exactly?
 
Back
Top