D
David W. Fenton
It's not about posting on microsoft.com. You're asking me to
make my MVP profile on microsoft.com public, which I'm not going
to do.
No, I'm not. I'm asking for you to post with your real name.
[]
Besides, Microsoft doesn't make it a requirement, but they do
request that we use the MVP designation in public. It helps
with public awareness.
If you're anonymous, it has no value at all, in my opinion --
anyone could claim it.
David, give the guy a break. I have no way to ascertain who he is,
but his assertion that there are MVP's who do not reveal their
real identity is absolutely true; and I find his reasons for
posting under a pseudonym quite reasonable. Given that he's giving
accurate, MVP-quality replies - which seems to be the case - I'd
be inclined to accept his peculiar situation.
I think he should not post with MVP in his sig if he's not willing
to verify his identity.
Quality posts are not limited to real MVPs (or people claiming to be
MVPs), and his posts will stand are fall based on their content,
regardless of what he's claiming in his signature. But having MVP in
the sig implies things to some people (wrongly, in my opinion).
There is one way for him to verify that he is an MVP. If he were to
participate in the MVP newsgroups, then other non-anonymous MVPs
could verify that he's legit.
Absent that, he must be completely bogus.