Do any P4's over a gig speed use PC-133 Ram?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Doc
  • Start date Start date
|dead_man_walking wrote:
|> On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 14:29:09 -0500, "sbb78247" <sbb78247@****off.com>
|> wrote:
|>
|>> dead_man_walking wrote:
|>>> On Wed, 7 Jun 2006 06:21:00 -0500, "sbb78247" <sbb78247@****off.com>
|>>> wrote:
|>>>
|>>>> Doc wrote:
|>>>>> The title pretty much says it. Do any P4's say faster than 1 gig
|>>>>> use PC-133 Ram? Or was that left behind with PIII's?
|>>>>
|>>>> one of the original 845 intel sets that supported socket 478 did
|>>>> this. at the time there were both versions of the 845 out one
|>>>> supported ddr the other sdr. asus p4b and p4pe are examples of
|>>>> this
|>>>
|>>> I'm shocked, amazed and transfixed that you actually stated
|>>> something that was not filled with hatred. Good job.
|>>
|>> ****wits deserve to be told they are such since usually they don't
|>> realize it. take john doe for example
|>
|> Cool, take john doe and example him after all he hace mastered teh art
|> of posting headers.
|
|that's not all he has mastered. i hear he wanks his crank a bit too!
|
|
Probably fantasizes about you whilst choking himself with his bow tie.
--
-John

Artificial Intelligence stands no chance
against Natural Stupidity.

Lynx users are like the Amish of the Internet.
 
John said:
How was life on the telephone before you became a foulmouthed tough
guy wanna-be on the Internet?
Click to expand...

wouldn't know about that, is that your job or have you moved up to pay per
view web cams
 
Dark said:
it failed to work for me, unable to detect. what was it you wanted to
know?

m/b ECS Skt 478 (Prescott) ATX, 648FX-A2
Click to expand...

isn't a 648 chipset SiS? <shudders> That might be why the INTEL CHIPSET
IDENTIFIER UTILITY did not work.
 
kony said:
Instead of posting to an excessive number of newsgroups you
might consider using a search engine- this is readily
available information.
Click to expand...

Odd that you suddenly take issue with this after having participated in
several prior threads with the same number of groups.

Btw, they've repealed the law requiring you to read all threads.
 
Odd that you suddenly take issue with this after having participated in
several prior threads with the same number of groups.
Click to expand...

Not at all odd, I mention these things every now and then
at random instead of making it an obsession. While I may
reply to some of the treads, others I don't participate in.

Pretty foolish to think it's the same thing posting to one
where I merely didn't choose to limit the groups, as
actively STARTING the thread where one DOES have to
actively choose all those groups.

Btw, they've repealed the law requiring you to read all threads.
Click to expand...


BTW, if you can't understand the what and why of usenet
etiquette, you'll just look all the more stupid trying to
be flippant about a mistake you have made.

Do you know why usenet works? Because everyone doesn't post
their topic to every single group that is loosely related.
It would inundate many groups with far too many posts and
create a mess that actually reduced the average quality of
replies. Even in your relatively short thread, half the
posts were troll related.
 
Not at all odd,
Click to expand...

Actually, I think it is.
Pretty foolish to think it's the same thing posting to one
where I merely didn't choose to limit the groups, as
actively STARTING the thread where one DOES have to
actively choose all those groups.
Click to expand...

You've actually made numerous posts in several threads I recently started.
Do you know why usenet works?
Click to expand...

Sure do. Largely unfettered access. That means the annoyance of putting up
with a certain amount of noise such as flame wars and pissy self-appointed
netkops. That time of the month?
Because everyone doesn't post
their topic to every single group that is loosely related.
Click to expand...

Nothing "loosely related" about the groups I chose. Logic dictates getting
it in front of as many eyes as possible, in this case groups where I deemed
it likely folks would have experience/interest in computer hardware a/or
repair. Appears to work too since I got a lot of quality responses.

I obviously think my choice of groups is reasonable, but if you disagree
with my choice, the solution for you is incredibly simple - don't read the
thread, don't participate. I can tell you exactly how far your trying to
"correct" me is going to get you.
Even in your relatively short thread, half the
posts were troll related.
Click to expand...

As is obvious to anyone who frequents newsgroups, thread drift and people
getting into pissing contests over side issues or the favorite "you don't
know what the hell you're talking about/screw you you don't know what you're
talking about and btw your mother is a whore" is part of the landscape
whether the topic is posted to one or ten groups.

Of course, many regard a "troll" as someone who makes a post that's just
noise and adds nothing informational, you know, like pointless whining about
which groups someone has chosen to post to.
 
Actually, I think it is.
Click to expand...

What do we care if you think it's odd or not?


You've actually made numerous posts in several threads I recently started.
Click to expand...

Then all the more appropriate that something is said about
excessive cross-posting.


Sure do. Largely unfettered access. That means the annoyance of putting up
with a certain amount of noise such as flame wars and pissy self-appointed
netkops. That time of the month?
Click to expand...

No, it works because of high SNR, and diversion of high
volumes of information into appropriate channels.

Nothing "loosely related" about the groups I chose.
Click to expand...

BS

sci.electronics.repair is not even close to related, nor is
a Compaq group unless it's a Compaq which you make no
mention of.

Actually none of the groups were appropriate since this is
information readily available if you had bothered to use a
search engine. Surely you are aware of search engines, and
that it is bad form to ask basic questions that would take
no more time to answer yourself, than to have others answer
for you then read through.

Logic dictates getting
it in front of as many eyes as possible,
Click to expand...

No, logic dictates that this creates a mess, trolling,
arguments between those actually knowledgeable about a topic
and those with only a passing familiarity, and in general
wastes peoples' time and bandwidth in addition to being an
addition burden on news servers.

In short, you're selfishness was perceived to benefit you
but ultimately your ignorance resulted in it being more of a
burden than just using a search engine. Further, if you
can't expect to get the right answer in the most appropriate
one or two newsgroups, odds are that you don't actually have
the most appropriate group, NOT that you need to cross post
to a half dozen or more of them which are clearly less
appropriate.

in this case groups where I deemed
it likely folks would have experience/interest in computer hardware a/or
repair. Appears to work too since I got a lot of quality responses.
Click to expand...

Actually if you want I'll help you learn how to post
correctly. You seem to need it.

If you had been on usenet a bit longer you would recognize
that you didn't actually get many posts at all considering
the number of groups. A single post to the most appropriate
group or two would tend to generate the correct answer- and
that is what it's all about, a few quality replies instead
of the gross # of replies.


I obviously think my choice of groups is reasonable, but if you disagree
with my choice, the solution for you is incredibly simple - don't read the
thread, don't participate. I can tell you exactly how far your trying to
"correct" me is going to get you.
Click to expand...

So far you have already demonstrated inability to even do a
web search for basic information... anything but impressive.
You'll get all the help you need because that's what usenet
is all about and you clearly demonstrate that you need LOTS
and LOTS of help.

As is obvious to anyone who frequents newsgroups, thread drift and people
getting into pissing contests over side issues or the favorite "you don't
know what the hell you're talking about/screw you you don't know what you're
talking about and btw your mother is a whore" is part of the landscape
whether the topic is posted to one or ten groups.
Click to expand...

Actually it's more common when someone excessively
cross-posts, BY FAR.

Of course, many regard a "troll" as someone who makes a post that's just
noise and adds nothing informational, you know, like pointless whining about
which groups someone has chosen to post to.
Click to expand...

If you weren't stupid, you'd realize that far more than
needing to know about a motherboard, you need to first know:

How to use a search engine to find information.
How to use usenet most effectively while not impinging on
it's performance as a whole.

If you had a little depth of though on the issue you would
see that if everyone posted as you do, your message would
have been lost in many hundreds to thousands of posts per
day per group. Not so likely to be read at all but those
who gave you helpful replies.

You want your posts to be the exception, you feel that it's
ok to do for your own benefit what would clearly be
problematic if everyone did it, and all out of laziness, for
a basic question that Google/etc could resolve. It's
pathetic.
 
kony said:
What do we care if you think it's odd or not?
Click to expand...

Ah, using "we" trying to co-opt the "strength of the group" to support your
own pissy little rant.
Yes.

it works because of high SNR,
Click to expand...

And you figure your ineffectual whining is going to improve it?
BS

sci.electronics.repair is not even close to related,
Click to expand...

So you feel computer repair is unrelated to electronics and that those with
an interest in electronics are not likely to be into computer repair. Sure
thing.
Actually none of the groups were appropriate since this is
information readily available if you had bothered to use a
search engine.
Click to expand...

So a query about computer hardware has no place in groups specifically
related to computer hardware.

To follow this to it's ludicrous conclusion would eliminate the point of
newsgroups altogether. The advantage to getting "live" responses is that you
get detail and feedback if something isn't clear, and the info is likely to
be more current. In addition, you get multiple points of view on a topic.
Just because something is on a website doesn't make it accurate or complete.

Hey, and it gives people like you a forum to vent your angst.
No, logic dictates that this creates a mess, trolling,
Click to expand...

You mean like the non-informational noise you've introduced?
arguments between those actually knowledgeable about a topic
Click to expand...

Ah, well now that's an interesting point. Disagreement between those
supposedly knowledgeable about a topic means someone's wrong. These pissing
contests arise in every forum I've ever seen, in many threads I had no input
into. Noone's forcing any of the participants to argue. You're shaking your
fist at human nature. When it's actually about a point of information, not
just carping such as you're engaging in, this is actually beneficial since
as I mentioned previously, it gives you more than one point of view, food
for thought and makes one aware of various issues. There are lots of folks
who claim to be knowledgeable who might have dubious credentials.
and in general wastes peoples' time
Click to expand...

Only if they read the thread, which you're still not required to do.

If you're that worked up over it, start a moderated forum and you can play
netgod.
If you weren't stupid
Click to expand...

Ah, the calling card of the 2nd rate mind.

You're unable to control your compulsion to read a thread, and continue to
rant when it's not going to change anything. The dunce cap clearly fits you
the best.

Ready?

Here it comes.


5....4....3.....2....1


*plonk*
 
Ah, the royal "we". Still pontificating are you,
koRny?

*TimDaniels*
Click to expand...

"We" were reading a thread that could be answered with a
search engine instead of excessive cross posting. That
truth contributes to the topic of the thread, as posted.
This is objective truth that contributes to the proper
function of usenet for everyone, "we", except the one
having the subjectively "odd" perception of it.
 
CBFalconer said:
Unfortunately my newsreader has no convenient means of ignoring
articles on the basis of foolish over cross-posting without setting
follow-ups. So it is necessary to PLONK the thread.
Click to expand...

If you see a topic it either interests you or it doesn't. If it doesn't, you
don't have to read it. What else do you need to do to ignore a thread?
 
On or aboutTue, 13 Jun 2006 02:56:04 GMT, John Doe
<[email protected]> defied logic with:


Not much of a nym shift.I count seven nosleeps. You missed a couple of
dozen. Joo hace not yet mastered the sakrit google. For your delight
and edification I will inform you that dead_man_walking is my new nym,
after all I hace had tee shirts printed up to **** with the Oncology
Dept at UW hospital, (They ****ing hate them) but they will serve a
dual purpose. I will send you one. Want me to send it to your home or
to the office?

FOB
HAND

|nym shifting troll
|
|See also (in order of appearance):
|dead_man_walking <none invalid.net>
|-nos1eep
|nos1eep
|nos1eep
|"nos1eep"
|"nos1eep"
|"nos1eep"
|"NoS1eep"
|"NoSleep"
--

-John

Wow, I am 2 months past my expiration date and still edible.

Artificial Intelligence stands no chance
against Natural Stupidity.

Lynx users are like the Amish of the Internet.
 
Back
Top