A
Alex
Danny Boy said:Jim Cheshire wrote:
Jim,
First off, I believe we can be pretty sure that Michael Dell is well aware
of the case.
All he has to do is to say "stop", and it would stop. But I can actually
understand if he want this tried in a court to see if Paul actually is
breaking some law or regulation. He could do that without intimidating
Paul with a law suit of that magnitude. He could sue Paul for a symbolic
sum of USD 1.00.
Why doesn't he do that? Because he is sanctioning the method of scaring
Paul into handing over the domain. To me, that's greed and what villains
do. The difference is that when "real" criminals are threatening people
into handing over their possessions, the former will be prosecuted.
Michael Dell won't.
So, while I certainly don't mind successful people at all, I despise
people who are bullying others, whether it's by physical or financial
strength. In this case, that's what Michael Dell does. IMHO, of course.
So, please give Paul a hand. Don't make my opinions and poor diplomatic
skills rub off on him. He's in desperate need of support. Money, of
course, but even your signature at the petition.
Cheers,
D
Paul Dell is a sympathetic guy, but Dell's lawyers are not being nasty for
the hell of it. The law gives them no choice. Trademark law says the owner
of a mark must VIGOROUSLY defend it against any infringer. To do otherwise
risks loss of the trademark.
Dell is in the computer business, most of which they do on the Web. It is
not a giant step to assume that some of their customers could be confused by
another "Dell" site that is in a somewhat related business. Thus they MUST
"vigorously" defend their name. If they don't, and a real infringement crops
up later -- cheap Chinese computers branded "Dell Plus," for example, the
courts could look at their earlier lack of vigor and decide Dell hadn't
adequately defended its turf and had surrendered the trademark.
If Paul Dell grew chickens or designed swimwear, "Dell-icious-Eggs.com" or
"PaulDellThongs.com" would in all likelihood be safe domain names, and ones
even Michael Dell's attorneys wouldn't bother.
But an ever-present nightmare for corporate attorneys is what happened to
"band aid" and "aspirin," both of which once were valuable trademarks but
which fell into common use, wiping out the rights of the owners of those
marks. And that is why "Xerox" fires off a legal notice every time a
journalist uses "xerox" as a verb. They don't really expect the journalists
to care; they just want to have a copy of the letter in their files, to
demonstrate that they are defending their intellectual property.
Alex