I'm sure in this case they simply never connected traces to the parts
of the chipset dealing with the PATA connectors. Thus saving some money
in the motherboard design, and also some board real-estate.
Not sure how the de-featured market works - obviously nVidia did a
reference design; mbrds are designed for the retail market which are not
emasculated. It'd be additional fixed cost expense to make a separate
design and production line for the defeatured board, for a minimal savings
in marginal production cost.
We see this in the retail baords, where there is often only one or two
basic board designs and the only differences between the various "Plus",
"Super", "Ultra" and "DeLuxe" versions is components - you see the solder
pads where the chips/connectors are missing.
The SATA
connectors are extremely easy to accomodate on even the smallest
form-factors. PATA aren't. And Dell is one of the driving members of
the SATA committee. They have likely got big deal set up with one of
the HD makers for SATA drives and therefore they would never be buying
PATA hard drives anyways, so PATA connectors on the mobo would be just
sitting uselessly for them.
Again, there are u-ATX boards out there with 2xPATA connectors; I have my
doubts that the designers would redo the place and route and do a
reschedule of stuffing for a cheap version... more likely just miss a
couple of stuff-stations and test-rigs... but I'm no authority on this.
Maybe someone else can comment on how the junk market is umm, provided?
You're probably right about Dell's motives... though the Plextor is the
only current seller of SATA DVD-R/RWs that I see.