G
Guest
Thanks for the correction.
You are not welcome.
As I said, I do not care to debug Microsoft products. If the idiots at
Microsoft think it is okay to fire any click event without an actual click
having taken place, it is their problem, not mine.
Yes, these are true and I stand by them. Thanks for restating them so that
anyone who reads the same knows what I wrote!
You actually have an agenda? Agenda is a bad choice of words. I 'll let you
break your stupid head over it.
:-( You have done nothing of the sort except to be argumentative and
provocative to the point where I call you a fool. Indeed you are a fool and a
very annoying fellow to wit. To offer advice, you need to have knowledge (you
don't). To correct misperceptions, you need to know what is right and wrong
(you don't). To provide 'counterpoint' to misinformation? Only you have a
fuzzy idea what you mean here.
Well, I am glad it has been fun for you. It has not been fun for me. Dealing
with fools is something I do not enjoy. You have certainly shown yourself to
be a leader amongst fools.
You are not welcome.
There is not. If you think so, file it. We get more than a few bug reports
here. And if it has any merit, otehrs will second it.
As I said, I do not care to debug Microsoft products. If the idiots at
Microsoft think it is okay to fire any click event without an actual click
having taken place, it is their problem, not mine.
"I have no interest in debugging Microsoft products."
" I am an expert assembly language programmer."
"Just because the logic operates as documented does not mean it is correct."
"Now who is the only software producer who can claim that
as long as the behavior matches the documentation, then it is correct and
get away with murder?"
Yes, these are true and I stand by them. Thanks for restating them so that
anyone who reads the same knows what I wrote!
Our agenda's our clear.
You actually have an agenda? Agenda is a bad choice of words. I 'll let you
break your stupid head over it.
Mine is to offer advice, correct misperceptions and to provide counterpoint
to misinformation.
:-( You have done nothing of the sort except to be argumentative and
provocative to the point where I call you a fool. Indeed you are a fool and a
very annoying fellow to wit. To offer advice, you need to have knowledge (you
don't). To correct misperceptions, you need to know what is right and wrong
(you don't). To provide 'counterpoint' to misinformation? Only you have a
fuzzy idea what you mean here.
I'll take the high road and not categorize yours (it's pretty transparent)
except to point out that this exchange has been a lot of fun for me.
Well, I am glad it has been fun for you. It has not been fun for me. Dealing
with fools is something I do not enjoy. You have certainly shown yourself to
be a leader amongst fools.