C
Cablewizard
Sounds like most of this is just plain sound coding practices.
Personally, I've found most performance issues are due to implementation, and
rethinking the logic and implementation is more appropriate than trying to
squeeze in more ill-conceived operations per second.
As far as Collections go, I agree. In most cases, if a Collection is appropriate
I implement my own strongly typed collection and querying logic.
So in the end, I still don't see the point of removing the reference to the DLL.
In my case, I knew that would be the case as I use the heck out of the VB stuff,
but I was curious.
Although with the recent chatter about Strings, I may research this some more
and some changes in my usage may be beneficial.
Thanks,
Gerald
Personally, I've found most performance issues are due to implementation, and
rethinking the logic and implementation is more appropriate than trying to
squeeze in more ill-conceived operations per second.
As far as Collections go, I agree. In most cases, if a Collection is appropriate
I implement my own strongly typed collection and querying logic.
So in the end, I still don't see the point of removing the reference to the DLL.
In my case, I knew that would be the case as I use the heck out of the VB stuff,
but I was curious.
Although with the recent chatter about Strings, I may research this some more
and some changes in my usage may be beneficial.
Thanks,
Gerald