Comparison of 2 HTML WYSIWYG editors: TSW Webcoder 4 and ActualDrawing v4.1.

  • Thread starter Thread starter fitwell
  • Start date Start date
short follow up: I remembered that I had a copy of Opera 7 that I seldom
use, so tried the Web site http://www.tsware.net in it, and it works
fine....so I guess Opera has fixed some little thing in the
upgrade....maybe I need to switch versions to be safe...*grin*...so TSW
looks like it is not at fault...

Sounds good!
 
Printed, as in actually printed, or displayed.

As I said, everything working fine this end, but need to know if it's
going to be doing something it shouldn't. So it makes a difference
what you mean by printed, exactly.

Sorry, displayed; I rarely fire up the printer except to contact my
solicitors.

The failure to notify me of unsaved files on shutdown was partly my
fault, I hadn't saved them, but a file that is saved does get a
cautionary notice.

I have to say, at this stage, I'm happier with one of the standard html
coders like evrsoft etc - they seem to write more easily and reliably and
preview quickly, insertion of graphics and links seems more easily
handled, and of course I haven't given the non-wysiwyg editor a try, and
I may just be more used to the others, which are IMO so similar you learn
one, you know em all. But that doesn't OK by me.

Perhaps non commercial editors are at a high state of development, and
only commercial wysiwyg editors cut it.

I must admit that how dreamweaver manages to write decent code after all
the reshuffling and mindchanging I do is totally beyond me.

I haven't registered it, but there's nothing in the prog to say that's
relevant to it's operation; (I don't like registering before I try, in
case I don't get on with it, like in this case)

Anyhow, I hope it's successful in the end, a lot of people want something
like this

mike r
 
Back
Top