Comparison of 2 HTML WYSIWYG editors: TSW Webcoder 4 and ActualDrawing v4.1.

  • Thread starter Thread starter fitwell
  • Start date Start date
F

fitwell

I've had enough time this morning to come to some preliminary
conclusions that I'd like to share re these 2 apps.

First off, though, re "wysiwyg": either the term is being misused or
I have not understood it 100%. It always seemed to me, from the time
of the decade change 80s->90s, that wysiwyg meant no more pages of
coding and we got real-time results from anything input in the
computer. So instead of <b>title</b>, we'd type ^b with the title
selected and that was that. However, since so many HTML editors are
claiming to be wysiwyg atually don't behave in this way, I had a
moment's doubt as to what I understood wysiwyg to be. However, since
have come to believe that developers are merely misusing the term.

A vast majority of the html editors out there, freeware or not, that I
have tried and that claim to be wysiwyg are just glorifed editors
because they have a preview mode. One still has to hard-code, so to
me, that is _not_ wysiwyg 100%. No editing can be done in that preview
mode, either, and that is the key!

So, I will use the term wysiwyg here in the way it is meant to be
used, in my opinion. User input produces an effect that is
instantaneously seen on the screen and that screen is what the user
works with, not a separate preview one.

With that definition, both TSW Webcoder and ActualDrawing, then, are
wysiwyg. You can make changes directly on an html document and you
can see the page you are working on as it would look if it were in
your browser.

However, there the similarity ends. They are worlds apart.

p.s., ActualDrawing, so very kindly provided by Tiger this morning in
ABF is not available on the net (thank you once again, Tiger!). I did
a search for the file, ActDrwStp_fr.exe, and no hits came up for me at
all in google. So perhaps it's okay that it doesn't come up to
scratch as it would only be available I guess by sharing in this
manner, anyway. It has a few other problems which I go over below
just so that you don't just get a message here that says: it doesn't
work well, so don't bother. Anyone can judge for themselves based on
the points below.

*******************************************************

ActualDrawing v4.1 (no URL)
(below seems true of all versions tried; 4 in total incl this one)

- cannot open all saved html files, for some reason
- No drag-'n-drop support
- files that _do_ open, more often than not display incorrectly and
even have parts missing (which leads me to believe it does not support
CSS very well, if at all. Even true of latest version, btw, I found).
- editing not very easy to do, paragraphs of text are treated like
blocks - i.e., like a graphic in word, it's blocked around - so text
is not always easy to modify. If you add/remove too much, box must be
re-sized.
- not available on the net, anyway

-------------------------------------------

TSW Webcoder 4 (http://www.tsware.net/download.php)

- so far it has opened all files I have tried
- drag-'n-drop supported when interface is in the EDIT tab so I just
dropped the html files in. Each doct. creates tab at the bottom so
very easy to have more than one open that you can toggle to.
- editing is as easy as any worprocessor like WordPerfect or Word.
- it is available on the net even if registerware.
- the options screen is quite comprehensive; exactly the type I like.
All sorts of things can be set in it incl. the folder the app defaults
to. Nice.
- no unwanted code put into documents so far even though it warns of
possibility. Code is clean.

Only drawback found so far is that there are a lot of error codes that
say app may shut down, but it generally doesn't so I don't worry.

Also, it doesn't like the backspace key and brings up an error box.
So I used the cursor to back up and then hit delete, instead.

-------------------------------------------

All in all, TSW Webcoder looks like a winner. It'll get seriously
tested over next few days as I finally can clean up some saved files
that I've collected over last 2 years that I recently was able to
index. I foresee only small amount of editing per file, perhaps, but
large volume of files in total. Just the sort of job one needs a
wysiwyg editor for.

TSW Webcoder may very well be a pricelessware 2005 candidate if it
continues to perform as it has and I see no serious glitches come up
as I start doing other tasks with it. (Thank you, JT, for recommending
this app!).

Will report back.

Thanks to everyone who contributed help with this! Cheers!
 
fitwell said:
A vast majority of the html editors out there, freeware or not, that I
have tried and that claim to be wysiwyg are just glorifed editors
because they have a preview mode.
Click to expand...

Good write-up. Glad someone finally exposed the WYSIWYG naming con. And
based on your write-up, I'm going to check out TSW Webcoder. That's one
that I've missed.
 
Good write-up. Glad someone finally exposed the WYSIWYG naming con. And
based on your write-up, I'm going to check out TSW Webcoder. That's one
that I've missed.
Click to expand...

Great, Jason! It'll be good to see what others think. I haven't used
it enough for people to base its value on my opinion alone, but if
several people give it a try and also find it good esp. over long
term, then it'll have passed the test. :oD
 
So you're saying you can try it before registering? It's letting me
download, but I hope it doesn't hit me for a password after installing.
Click to expand...

No, you _can_ most definitely try it out. You just get a 6 second
delay screen before you can use the app. Also, forgot to mention, it
seems you could use as is that way; it's not crippleware or anything.
You'd just live with that 6-second nag screen forever. I hate delay
with a passion, so I accepted registering.

Sorry 'bout that, what I said could and was misinterpreted. My fault.
:oD
 
A vast majority of the html editors out there, freeware or not, that I
have tried and that claim to be wysiwyg are just glorifed editors
because they have a preview mode. One still has to hard-code, so to
me, that is _not_ wysiwyg 100%. No editing can be done in that preview
mode, either, and that is the key!
Click to expand...
-------------------------------------------

TSW Webcoder 4 (http://www.tsware.net/download.php)

- so far it has opened all files I have tried
- drag-'n-drop supported when interface is in the EDIT tab so I just
dropped the html files in. Each doct. creates tab at the bottom so
very easy to have more than one open that you can toggle to.
- editing is as easy as any worprocessor like WordPerfect or Word.
- it is available on the net even if registerware.
- the options screen is quite comprehensive; exactly the type I like.
All sorts of things can be set in it incl. the folder the app defaults
to. Nice.
- no unwanted code put into documents so far even though it warns of
possibility. Code is clean.

Only drawback found so far is that there are a lot of error codes that
say app may shut down, but it generally doesn't so I don't worry.

Also, it doesn't like the backspace key and brings up an error box.
So I used the cursor to back up and then hit delete, instead.
Click to expand...
<snip>

I downloaded Webcoder and played around with it at home. It does a very
good job...too bad no word wrap! Also, I did not have any of the error
problems you reported on my Win2K box.

In regards to "true" WYSIWYG, FPE is just as you describe. It looks
kinda like MS Word and you make all your changes like a word processor.
You can move to a code view if you want, but it produces some UGLY code.
I usually have a lot of cleaning to do.

Anyhoo...I plan on keeping webcoder to do WYSIWYG work if I need to.
Thanx for the tips.

I also found that the other program called home (4.3 version) and I do
not like that.

--
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
El Gee

Did you hear the one about the dyslexic, agnostic, insomniac?
He would stay up late every night and wonder if there was a dog.
Remove yourhat to reply ... but it
may take a while. Best to go to www (dot) mistergeek (dot) com and
reply from there.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
<snip>

I downloaded Webcoder and played around with it at home. It does a very
good job...too bad no word wrap! Also, I did not have any of the error
problems you reported on my Win2K box.
Click to expand...

Well, I have word wrap just fine, so it's a puzzle. However, I'd be
using it primarily in QUICKEDIT mode, anway, so no problems for me.
In regards to "true" WYSIWYG, FPE is just as you describe. It looks
kinda like MS Word and you make all your changes like a word processor.
You can move to a code view if you want, but it produces some UGLY code.
I usually have a lot of cleaning to do.
Click to expand...

Didn't happen to me at all, as I mentioned, but it's good to know.
But I'm not doing anything complicated, I need wysiwig strictly for
text editing/formatting. For the rest I'd probably do it hardcode-way
for precision anyway since I know how to do things that way that I'd
have to stop and figure out in TSW.
Anyhoo...I plan on keeping webcoder to do WYSIWYG work if I need to.
Click to expand...

Same here.
Thanx for the tips.
Click to expand...

Welcome said:
I also found that the other program called home (4.3 version) and I do
not like that.
Click to expand...

True. But I suspect it's from wanting to ftp upload or something (?).
I just forbid it access via my firewall. It had too much else wrong
with it anyway to worry about.

Cheers!
 
Thanks for the preliminary info; I downloaded it last night following
Dennis's post, and opened up one of my pages, which seemed fine.

However, the warning notices put the wind up me, and it was late, so I
didn't mess with my site, but I shall want to do some new pages for xmas,
so I'll give it a try, after your encouraging report.

Particularly good that it does clean code, although I learned a lot
cleaning up after FPE! (but it _had_ got me published)

mike r
 
TSW Webcoder may very well be a pricelessware 2005 candidate if it
continues to perform as it has and I see no serious glitches come up
as I start doing other tasks with it. (Thank you, JT, for recommending
this app!).

Will report back.

Thanks to everyone who contributed help with this! Cheers!
Click to expand...
an interesting thing about the TSW site...I went there in Opera 6, and
found it was cut off at the bottom of the page....that is, Opera gave no
scroll bar. I could reduce the display size and see stuff below, but not
get to everything, including the registration box...
So, on a hunch, I switched to Mozilla and it loaded & displayed fine
and I did everything I needed to.

Opera usually has no problems, but perhaps if TSW's page is made with
TSW..(seems likely!) there might be some sort of code incompatibility,
and it bears being careful... I haven't had time to install & test it,
but hope it's a minor issue.....

thanks for the review
 
fitwell said:
Great, Jason! It'll be good to see what others think. I haven't used
it enough for people to base its value on my opinion alone, but if
several people give it a try and also find it good esp. over long
term, then it'll have passed the test. :oD
Click to expand...
Dang... TSW Webcoder looked like what I wanted. BUT...it would hang moving
between the Quick Edit and Edit tabs. Maybe I don't have the right ActiveX
components??
 
Thanks for the preliminary info; I downloaded it last night following
Dennis's post, and opened up one of my pages, which seemed fine.

However, the warning notices put the wind up me, and it was late, so I
didn't mess with my site, but I shall want to do some new pages for xmas,
so I'll give it a try, after your encouraging report.

Particularly good that it does clean code, although I learned a lot
cleaning up after FPE! (but it _had_ got me published)
Click to expand...

Ah, so you got the boxes, too. What I found is that nothing happened;
they were just a lot of warnings. When I posted about the app
crashing a lot at one point, what followed is that that was the
beginning of the end and I couldn't delay wiping the drive anymore.
Those html editors finished everything off since I had installed/
uninstalled a lot of apps in last 2 or 3 days! So as I use it again
on this new clean system will see if it's acting better, or at least
as well as it did originally.

A note re editing, I can _only_ vouch for the type of thing I have
been doing, that is just simple text formatting and attribute changes
(bolding, centering, italicizing, moving text, etc.). I inserted some
pictures and that seemed fine, too but I've done nothing more
complicated than this. It bears reiterating that it may _not_ behave
as well when doing more complicated tasks. I'd like to know myself
how well this app works as a long term solution to all our html needs.
All I can say, though, is that even if it turns out to only behave
well with simple tasks, it still gets a vote from me as it does this
very well!

Perhaps as others use it for broader tasks they can let the group know
their findings???

Good luck!
 
Dang... TSW Webcoder looked like what I wanted. BUT...it would hang moving
between the Quick Edit and Edit tabs. Maybe I don't have the right ActiveX
components??
Click to expand...

Could be. I didn't have this problem with it but I'm on a clean
system and it'll be interesting to see what, if any, problems I have
in getting it to run. I'll probably be trying to install it again
today or tomorrow.
 
an interesting thing about the TSW site...I went there in Opera 6, and
found it was cut off at the bottom of the page....that is, Opera gave no
scroll bar. I could reduce the display size and see stuff below, but not
get to everything, including the registration box...
So, on a hunch, I switched to Mozilla and it loaded & displayed fine
and I did everything I needed to.

Opera usually has no problems, but perhaps if TSW's page is made with
TSW..(seems likely!) there might be some sort of code incompatibility,
and it bears being careful... I haven't had time to install & test it,
but hope it's a minor issue.....

thanks for the review
Click to expand...

Welcome and thank you for letting us know re the above; seems likely
they would use their own app to build the pages so something to bear
in mind. Pages displayed fine in MSIE.

I TSW exclusively for hdd html copies at this stage. I have no
website at all, so not an issue for me, but it'll be good to know what
limitations it has. Hyptertext seems to be changing so fast these
days; I've been told my hard-coding is archaic in another group when I
posted code with a question. So who knows how long any editors will
last because of this. Very discouraging. However, I can have
whatever the hell damn code I please on my computer so TSW is perfect
for me <g>.

:oD
 
All I can say, though, is that even if it turns out to only behave
well with simple tasks, it still gets a vote from me as it does this
very well!

Perhaps as others use it for broader tasks they can let the group know
their findings???

Good luck!
Click to expand...
I've found one or two things that worry me a bit, I tried to alter font
colours and it failed, just put the font colour in the text, and when I
closed the prog, deliberately not having saved, it didn't remind me
before closing.
I look forward to seeing what it's done to my page.

TBH, it looks like quite a good editor to me, but I don't think it's
achieved WYSIWYG, tho it honestly tries to be. Perhaps it will be
improved, there's not much point in unreliability, yoou have to spend all
the time coping. But as it's a lite version, perhaps the writers will be
less interested in it than the paid for one.

It did do some mucky code on constantly resizing, but it's own tool
cleaned it up.

Somme help would be nice - I understand their point, but the problem may
well be at my end, and there's no FM to read

mike r
 
All I can say, though, is that even if it turns out to only behave
well with simple tasks, it still gets a vote from me as it does this
very well!

Perhaps as others use it for broader tasks they can let the group know
their findings???

Good luck!
Click to expand...
[snip]

TBH, it looks like quite a good editor to me, but I don't think it's
achieved WYSIWYG, tho it honestly tries to be. Perhaps it will be
Click to expand...

Why? Can't get more WYSIWYG than in the QUICKEDIT view.
 
On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 16:38:33 -0500, Bill Day
Click to expand...
Welcome and thank you for letting us know re the above; seems likely
they would use their own app to build the pages so something to bear
in mind. Pages displayed fine in MSIE.
Click to expand...
short follow up: I remembered that I had a copy of Opera 7 that I seldom
use, so tried the Web site http://www.tsware.net in it, and it works
fine....so I guess Opera has fixed some little thing in the
upgrade....maybe I need to switch versions to be safe...*grin*...so TSW
looks like it is not at fault...
 
Why? Can't get more WYSIWYG than in the QUICKEDIT view.
Click to expand...
Cos I don't think it quite gets there, like when I tried to change a font
colour it just printed #FF0000 on the displayed page.

mike r
 
Cos I don't think it quite gets there, like when I tried to change a font
colour it just printed #FF0000 on the displayed page.
Click to expand...

Printed, as in actually printed, or displayed.

As I said, everything working fine this end, but need to know if it's
going to be doing something it shouldn't. So it makes a difference
what you mean by printed, exactly.
 
Back
Top