C
Cathy
Has anyone tried any of these free items? Just wondering about the quality.
http://www.comodogroup.com/products/free_products.html
http://www.comodogroup.com/products/free_products.html
Cathy said:Has anyone tried any of these free items? Just wondering about the
quality.
hxxp://www.comodogroup.com/products/free_products.html
Or, are you spamming for this comode company?
kurt wismer said:Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
[snip]Or, are you spamming for this comode company?
was that spelling intentional?
kurt said:Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
[snip]Or, are you spamming for this comode company?
was that spelling intentional?
You've posted this to at least four separate groups. Please investigate
cross-posting, rather than multi-posting.
http://oakroadsystems.com/genl/unice.htm#xpost
Or, are you spamming for this comode company?
Postman said:Beauregard T. Shagnasty laid this down on his screen :
Cathy,
I agree with the link you provided, 4 years ago! Currently I have a
different opinion about cross-posting because of the horrid increase
of Usenet spam...
Some newsreaders have the ability to block cross-posters! My feeling
is spammers are 95 - 97% of the cross-posters, so a newsreader that
filters/blocks cross-posting like agent and x-news are good.
My opinion, but this message appears to be the registrant, their
employee or a hired spammer implementing their newest spam-marketing
plan.
If the message contained more specific questions, other than the
general question that was provided, and the posters using a weblink
as the main subject is the reason I have formed that opinion.
Cross posting was a great method of cutting down bandwidth use, it is
still a wonderful method, but this Usenet feature is the spammers¢
gift horse.
Heather said:kurt wismer said:Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
[snip]Or, are you spamming for this comode company?
was that spelling intentional?
Probably, knowing Shaggy......but it is "commode". Merkins can't
spell worth a damn, lol.
Beauregard T. Shagnasty said:Heather said:kurt wismer said:Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
[snip]
Or, are you spamming for this comode company?
was that spelling intentional?
Probably, knowing Shaggy......but it is "commode". Merkins can't
spell worth a damn, lol.
Hey! That *was* intentional. The subject only has one "m", so that is
how I spelled the "comode" ... This Merkin can speel gud.
Postman said:Beauregard T. Shagnasty laid this down on his screen :
Cathy,
My opinion, but this message appears to be the registrant, their
employee or a hired spammer implementing their newest spam-marketing
plan.
I'm using the free firewall version 2 and it seems to be very good imhoRhonda said:Actually, you were responding to Beau, not to Cathy.
<snipped>
I doubt it. Melih doesn't strike me as the sort to stoop that low.
Besides which, he has a lot of enthusiasm for his own product, so if he
were going to hawk his wares, he'd do it directly, not rely on a
go-between.
All the products she's asking about are totally free programs, not trial
versions. He does have products for which he charges--one of which I
use--but you can't call it spam when it isn't commercial.
All that said, as I understand it, the antivirus program needs work.
rl
I agree-I tried to install it on an older laptop I have(PII)and comodoAV<snipped even more>
the antivirus program needs work.
rl
Good Grief!Cathy said:Has anyone tried any of these free items? Just wondering about the
quality.
http://www.comodogroup.com/products/free_products.html
Hi Cathy,Has anyone tried any of these free items? Just wondering about the quality.
http://www.comodogroup.com/products/free_products.html
.but couldn't resist the chance to tease you
Beauregard,I have an entirely different opinion. <g> All the spam I see is sent
individually to each newsgroup. Can you point to a specific spam that
really was *cross*-posted?
Forgot about this insidious spammer...I have an entirely different opinion. <g> All the spam I see is sent
individually to each newsgroup. Can you point to a specific spam that
really was *cross*-posted?
Postman said:Beauregard asked for a cross-posted example :
Beauregard,
Setting your blocking of cross-posting must realy work if you are not
seeing this increase of Usenet spam marketing...
Immediately below is the Header of a "bassett" a troll that I could
use some help with... I do not subscribe to the statement everyone
needs a troll, yet he follows me, locating where I post and posting
off topic info...
No, I do see a lot of spam, but practically all of it is multi-posted,
not cross-posted.
Ok, now you are not talking about spam and spammers. A troll who follows
you is not a spammer, he's a troll. Completely different subject.
Spammers post messages looking for financial gain, to sell something. A
troll is just a Grade-A nuisance. If you reader is capable, set it to
auto-delete all posts cross-posted to more than three groups. Ignore the
troll.
Postman said:First header is my troll, second, thrid and the forth headers are
spammers as I tried to indicate...
I would presume you have your cross-posting blocker set at three so
you do not see the increase in corss-posting. With that setting you
would only see spam that it is multi-posted.