Fruit2O said:
I have a laptop and can put a drive in an extra bay. I would like to
have a backup of my primary drive in case it goes bad. I have been
told that an image is better than a clone - so I'm confused. I
thought a clone was an exact duplicate of another drive - so, if I
cloned my primary drive and it went bad, I could just swap it for the
clone and I would be back in business. What is the difference between
that and an image and which is better for what I want to do?
Just to add to Ted's answer, if anything a clone is better than an image,
since it can be used directly without having to be restored. However an
image is smaller than a clone and often can be created faster, so many
people prefer imaging.
One additional point: I do *not* recommend that you put a backup drive in an
extra bay. I don't recommend backup to a second non-removable hard drive
because it leaves you susceptible to simultaneous loss of the original and
backup to many of the most common dangers: severe power glitches, nearby
lightning strikes, virus attacks, even theft of the computer. With a laptop,
I feel even more strongly about that, because of the increased danger of its
being stolen, and because you also have the additional risk opf dropping the
entire computer and cxrashing both drives.
In my view, secure backup needs to be on removable media, and not kept in
the computer. For really secure backup (needed, for example, if the life of
your business depends on your data) you should have multiple generations of
backup, and at least one of those generations should be stored off-site.
--
Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
Please reply to the newsgroup
My computer isn't used for business, but my personal backup scheme uses two
identical removable hard drives,I alternate between the two, and use Acronis
True Image to make a complete copy of the primary drive.
I also use a pair of 1GB thumb drives for making more frequent backups of my
most critical data (like financial information). For that I just drag and
drop.