M
Michael Johnson
Boskey said:They are comparing dollars for dollars, so the dollar savings in your
example is $9.41 more remaining in their pockets than in Canon's pocket.
Whether the generic ink quality is equal is the debate. Many here say the
quality of the generic inks has risen to the point that from their
perspective, there is no noticeable difference. As such, the price point of
the product now becomes the only difference to these buyers.
When is the last time you tried out a generic ink? Your continual concern
for others in this matter suggests you may have had a very bad past
experience using generic inks. Another possibility is you are on the
payroll of one of the printer manufacturers.
He just provided proof that he is an idiot. First, he says I am buying
generic ink. This is wrong as I buy COMPATIBLE ink and there is a big
difference between the two. Second, his analogy is flawed. A proper
analogy is that I am buying less expensive unbranded oranges instead of
the more expensive ones with Sunkist stamped on them. For all practical
purposes they are both oranges and, to me, they taste the same. I like
that he buys OEM ink because it means I can continue to buy cheap
printers in the future. Kill file this waste of bandwidth and your
experience here will be much better.