L
Lucas Tam
FAT32 is for cards larger than 2GB.
Hopefully Canon will give you a firmware fix ...
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
FAT32 is for cards larger than 2GB.
Hopefully Canon will give you a firmware fix ...
S
SleeperMan
Lucas Tam typed:
I think that's not needed for two reasons:
1.) this camera was tested succesfully with 4G card, so as said, it does use
FAT32
2.) it's not even near probability of me using 1G or more CF cards...i'll
rather buy DV camera....
remember that i bought this digital camera merely for pictures. I can live
with 2 min clips, since i'll more or less shoot it at hoem, where i can
quickly transfer it to PC...
But problem of this camera is not FAT32, but not being able to store files
larger than 1G - it's not FAT system's fault, but something else...
FAT32 is for cards larger than 2GB.
Hopefully Canon will give you a firmware fix ...
I think that's not needed for two reasons:
1.) this camera was tested succesfully with 4G card, so as said, it does use
FAT32
2.) it's not even near probability of me using 1G or more CF cards...i'll
rather buy DV camera....
remember that i bought this digital camera merely for pictures. I can live
with 2 min clips, since i'll more or less shoot it at hoem, where i can
quickly transfer it to PC...
But problem of this camera is not FAT32, but not being able to store files
larger than 1G - it's not FAT system's fault, but something else...
S
SleeperMan
frank1492 typed:
I personally doubt that there's any difference between US and UK model. One
of them is putting wrong data on it's addvertisement. Which one...i think
one who's claiming better and faster specs...
Still wanting to know why the descrepancy in
speed. And is the i990 significantly different
(except for the number of ink tanks.)?
Thanks.
I personally doubt that there's any difference between US and UK model. One
of them is putting wrong data on it's addvertisement. Which one...i think
one who's claiming better and faster specs...
P
PS
The UK product specification says: up to 4800 X 2400. But you need to read
the footnote which shows:
Resolution
¹ Maximum resolution of 4800 x 1200 dpi used at the bottom edge of the
page
Starts to look a lot like the US Spec... Have to read these things
CAREFULLY. Canon is probably more careful about its performance claims in
the US due to the litigious character of the technology consumer...
the footnote which shows:
Resolution
¹ Maximum resolution of 4800 x 1200 dpi used at the bottom edge of the
page
Starts to look a lot like the US Spec... Have to read these things
CAREFULLY. Canon is probably more careful about its performance claims in
the US due to the litigious character of the technology consumer...
D
Dick
I'm sure it is EXACTLY the same printer, except for the DVD tray kit,
regardless of differences in how the specifications were written.
Dick
regardless of differences in how the specifications were written.
Dick
M
Mavrick
They have slower seconds
frank1492 said:then why does the i960 claim 37 secs for a 4x6 print
and the i965 claim 21?
M
Mavrick
Could one get a cd tray kit for the i960?
Dick said:I'm sure it is EXACTLY the same printer, except for the DVD tray kit,
regardless of differences in how the specifications were written.
Dick