F
FromTheRafters
Dustin Cook said:@news.eternal-september.org:
It's not malicious for stealing cpu cycles alone. It's considered
malicious
because it makes unwanted changes to other aspects of the system,
sometimes
with dire results; and not intended by the author.
***
Are you saying they (viruses) are considered malicious because they tend
to be buggy?
***
Obviously this applies to viruses, and not this fellows botnet for
sale...
***
I was just trying to show that the definition (Turing machine
computational model) of "virus" is less like "malware" and more like
"neutral" as in more like an automated copy/paste operation performed on
itself. Sure, if a contemporary virus infects programs that the user
doesn't want infected, it is malware (makes unwanted modifications). The
term "virus" does not mean "malware" while the term "botnet" apparently
does - else they would be called "distributed computing networks". So
botnet will always have a negative connotation, by definition (just as
Pluto will never again be a planet, by definition).
***