J
John Spiegel
WOW, how do we get more people like you out there?
I've often suspected, and sometimes been told outright by headhunters (who I
suspect to had just learned how to _spell_ COM the week before) that I
wasn't qualified for a number of jobs because my resume only included SQL,
VFP, VB, ASP and COM, while the company wanted many of those plus PHP,
Oracle, CORBA,Acess, J2EE, ProMatrix, Peoplesoft, three different third
party tools and KitchenSink version pi.e.-1^(1/2). Oh and demonstrated
experience writing software for the animal husbandry industry.
My bestpartial theory has been that managers got in a mindset during the
feeding frenzy in the late 90's many haven't left yet, i.e., this guy's only
gonna be here for a few months so he better know it all while we've got him.
It's a vicious cycle: In an effort to reduce the number of resumes to sift
through, managers put outlandish requirements in an ads while programmers,
in order to get their resumes noticed, try to claim proficiency in a dozen
languages. These same managers start seeing scores of applicants claiming
these proficiencies which reinforces the idea that they're not asking for
too much.
I've often suspected, and sometimes been told outright by headhunters (who I
suspect to had just learned how to _spell_ COM the week before) that I
wasn't qualified for a number of jobs because my resume only included SQL,
VFP, VB, ASP and COM, while the company wanted many of those plus PHP,
Oracle, CORBA,Acess, J2EE, ProMatrix, Peoplesoft, three different third
party tools and KitchenSink version pi.e.-1^(1/2). Oh and demonstrated
experience writing software for the animal husbandry industry.
My bestpartial theory has been that managers got in a mindset during the
feeding frenzy in the late 90's many haven't left yet, i.e., this guy's only
gonna be here for a few months so he better know it all while we've got him.
It's a vicious cycle: In an effort to reduce the number of resumes to sift
through, managers put outlandish requirements in an ads while programmers,
in order to get their resumes noticed, try to claim proficiency in a dozen
languages. These same managers start seeing scores of applicants claiming
these proficiencies which reinforces the idea that they're not asking for
too much.
Stu Banter said:[snap]
Of course these are the same headhunters that say, "If you've touched
something, put it on your resume."
Gee, would I have to tell my future employer of all the interesting things I
touched ? Could be an embarrassing situation and a LOOOONG resume ;-)
But yes, I know the type of aggressive resume-building mediators like to
portray. My career at Unilever started with me being 'sold' to them as Lotus
CC-mail expert by my agent, where the actual cc:mail knowledge I had was I
knew where the icon for it on my laptop was... I had NEVER written an email
before I stepped in their building.... Haha...
It also proved a lesson to myself, I picked up all I needed for the job
within 2 months, and the same applied for other 'invented' fields of
expertise. Since then I never looked seriously at the Experience paragraph
in someone's resume once I got to be the interviewer/hirer, and instead
tried to get a glimpse of someone's personality, response to unexpected
situations and their real interests in life. I think I've hired many of the
people no other clients would have hired, and I can't say my business ran
worse then theirs....