["charles"; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 13:39:15 GMT]
Agree completely. Foobar2000 is the best I've used. It should have made
the list.
Does it have anything over Quintessential Player?
I haven't tried Quintessential Player but am with Charles Re: Foobar2000
being the best. The biggest appeal, to me, is the absolute-minimalist
approach regarding the interface but without sacrificing a robust (and
expandable) featureset. I may, admittedly, be a bit overwhelming to any
new user, however, as it's hardly your typical WYSIWYG application.
There are so many fully-featured audio-playback applications out there, I
find that it's becoming harder and harder to say "This is definitely
better..." or "This is definitely worse..." -- Most of the applications
provide most of the features that most users [require]. So if the user has
some very-particular (and more obscure) needs, find the application that
supports those, it will most likely support all the more-obvious features
inherently. Otherwise, it's just a matter of finding an application that
fits your personal taste/methods.
Foobar's minimalist interface but dauntingly-robust customizability suits
my taste quite nicely -- and it's great for those of us (myself included)
who prefer keyboard operation over mouse. The keyboard-shortcut
implementation is extensive.
For a user who finds the general aesthetic of a player like WinAmp or
Sonique preferable and who agrees that such an application supports all
necessary features for their tastes, I'd not likely suggest foobar.
--
Allen
http://theprawn.com
This is for the flowers,
http://protempore.org/jarday
who have no appreciation
for beauty;
And the sheer ugliness of it all
will surely be lost on them.