D
Dallas
thanks twayne, still waiting to hear back from him - been a day & a half so
far !
far !
Dallas said:vanguard ? anyone ?
Dallas said:heres the results from the first test run w/out any add-ons:
============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total: 46912.2ms +/- 2.4%
--------------------------------------------
3d: 2159.6ms +/- 1.0%
cube: 575.0ms +/- 2.8%
morph: 656.4ms +/- 0.1%
raytrace: 928.2ms +/- 2.4%
access: 2709.4ms +/- 1.5%
binary-trees: 678.0ms +/- 1.5%
fannkuch: 990.8ms +/- 1.7%
nbody: 550.0ms +/- 3.0%
nsieve: 490.6ms +/- 6.1%
bitops: 2306.2ms +/- 9.6%
3bit-bits-in-byte: 615.6ms +/- 17.0%
bits-in-byte: 521.8ms +/- 2.1%
bitwise-and: 625.0ms +/- 12.4%
nsieve-bits: 543.8ms +/- 10.8%
controlflow: 696.8ms +/- 1.6%
recursive: 696.8ms +/- 1.6%
crypto: 1493.8ms +/- 1.7%
aes: 553.2ms +/- 1.9%
md5: 468.8ms +/- 2.8%
sha1: 471.8ms +/- 1.8%
date: 1415.6ms +/- 3.3%
format-tofte: 643.8ms +/- 2.5%
format-xparb: 771.8ms +/- 6.8%
math: 1771.8ms +/- 2.4%
cordic: 684.4ms +/- 3.1%
partial-sums: 443.6ms +/- 4.0%
spectral-norm: 643.8ms +/- 1.3%
regexp: 405.8ms +/- 3.4%
dna: 405.8ms +/- 3.4%
string: 33953.2ms +/- 3.6%
base64: 14484.4ms +/- 7.9%
fasta: 815.6ms +/- 3.1%
tagcloud: 5378.4ms +/- 3.0%
unpack-code: 862.4ms +/- 2.5%
validate-input: 12412.4ms +/- 2.6%
VanguardLH said:Dallas said:heres the results from the first test run w/out any add-ons:
============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total: 46912.2ms +/- 2.4%
--------------------------------------------
3d: 2159.6ms +/- 1.0%
cube: 575.0ms +/- 2.8%
morph: 656.4ms +/- 0.1%
raytrace: 928.2ms +/- 2.4%
access: 2709.4ms +/- 1.5%
binary-trees: 678.0ms +/- 1.5%
fannkuch: 990.8ms +/- 1.7%
nbody: 550.0ms +/- 3.0%
nsieve: 490.6ms +/- 6.1%
bitops: 2306.2ms +/- 9.6%
3bit-bits-in-byte: 615.6ms +/- 17.0%
bits-in-byte: 521.8ms +/- 2.1%
bitwise-and: 625.0ms +/- 12.4%
nsieve-bits: 543.8ms +/- 10.8%
controlflow: 696.8ms +/- 1.6%
recursive: 696.8ms +/- 1.6%
crypto: 1493.8ms +/- 1.7%
aes: 553.2ms +/- 1.9%
md5: 468.8ms +/- 2.8%
sha1: 471.8ms +/- 1.8%
date: 1415.6ms +/- 3.3%
format-tofte: 643.8ms +/- 2.5%
format-xparb: 771.8ms +/- 6.8%
math: 1771.8ms +/- 2.4%
cordic: 684.4ms +/- 3.1%
partial-sums: 443.6ms +/- 4.0%
spectral-norm: 643.8ms +/- 1.3%
regexp: 405.8ms +/- 3.4%
dna: 405.8ms +/- 3.4%
string: 33953.2ms +/- 3.6%
base64: 14484.4ms +/- 7.9%
fasta: 815.6ms +/- 3.1%
tagcloud: 5378.4ms +/- 3.0%
unpack-code: 862.4ms +/- 2.5%
validate-input: 12412.4ms +/- 2.6%
I don't have the post showing your original timings, but it seems you
are about half of what you reported before. That's better but still
pretty long. However, from what I've seen reported for this benchmark,
my timings are about 4 times longer than in those reports. So it could
be due to my older hardware not being able to punch through as many
instruction cycles per second as newer hardware used in those reports,
or I have more background processes running than they did. The same
would go for you regarding [old] hardware and lots of background
processes sucking up memory and/or CPU cycles.
As a last resort test, I'd reboot into Window's Safe Mode and disable
the anti-virus program (if still enabled) and retest to see if the
timing score got any better.
That all the Javascript tests pass regardless of how long they take
proves that Javascript is enabled in the web browser. Something else is
screwed up at the bank site. However, you said their tech said it was a
problem with [your] Java which is NOT a Javascript problem. I access a
couple of banks online and a few more over the years and haven't had one
that used Java. Its requirement puts a crimp in compatibility amongst
all their customers. Not all of them can install Java or have a
compatible version of it installed, like when at a resort and using
their computer room or going to Kinkos or a library to use their
computers where you're not allowed to install any software. For
accessibility by all their customers, they should be providing a
non-Java access method.
Did you uninstall ALL versions of JRE (Java Runtime Environment) and
then install just the latest JRE?
What version of IE are you using?
Dallas said:sorry vanguard as i have not been feeling well. thanks for the info.
question on paragraph 2; as usual, i am confused. i can disable the av
program without being in safe mode, or is it different disabling in normal
mode? also, i just checked & it's not enabled. what is enabled at this
time are the following:
free threaded xml dom document 4.0
shockwave flash object
xml dom document 6.0
xml http 6.0
xsl template 6.0
re: paragraph 3; he still thinks its my pc & not the banks system. he said
he would contact the software makers & see if they have an answer. ha! my
weak point to him was i changed absolutely nothing on my pc & everytime
prior i had no probl;ems logging in then one day, bam, i can't get in.
that said, i can with operas browser, but i don't like opera, but if i
have to i will change, reluctantly.
re: paragraph 4, currently in add/remove, i have:
java (tm) 6 update 14
"" "" 4
"" "" 5
I'll remove all 3 & go to java & install the latest update. but now that
begs this question from me; why does it only list those 3 updates but not
just plain old "java" by itself ?
re: 5, i am using ie7
thanks so much & will check back later for follow-up
have a great day in the meantime
--
Dallas.....
Dell P 4, 3GHz, 512 MB DDR SDRAM, 160 GB, Win XP Home
16X DVD-ROM & ,6X DVD+/RW, IE7, OE6, DSL, via AT&T
VanguardLH said:Dallas said:heres the results from the first test run w/out any add-ons:
============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total: 46912.2ms +/- 2.4%
--------------------------------------------
3d: 2159.6ms +/- 1.0%
cube: 575.0ms +/- 2.8%
morph: 656.4ms +/- 0.1%
raytrace: 928.2ms +/- 2.4%
access: 2709.4ms +/- 1.5%
binary-trees: 678.0ms +/- 1.5%
fannkuch: 990.8ms +/- 1.7%
nbody: 550.0ms +/- 3.0%
nsieve: 490.6ms +/- 6.1%
bitops: 2306.2ms +/- 9.6%
3bit-bits-in-byte: 615.6ms +/- 17.0%
bits-in-byte: 521.8ms +/- 2.1%
bitwise-and: 625.0ms +/- 12.4%
nsieve-bits: 543.8ms +/- 10.8%
controlflow: 696.8ms +/- 1.6%
recursive: 696.8ms +/- 1.6%
crypto: 1493.8ms +/- 1.7%
aes: 553.2ms +/- 1.9%
md5: 468.8ms +/- 2.8%
sha1: 471.8ms +/- 1.8%
date: 1415.6ms +/- 3.3%
format-tofte: 643.8ms +/- 2.5%
format-xparb: 771.8ms +/- 6.8%
math: 1771.8ms +/- 2.4%
cordic: 684.4ms +/- 3.1%
partial-sums: 443.6ms +/- 4.0%
spectral-norm: 643.8ms +/- 1.3%
regexp: 405.8ms +/- 3.4%
dna: 405.8ms +/- 3.4%
string: 33953.2ms +/- 3.6%
base64: 14484.4ms +/- 7.9%
fasta: 815.6ms +/- 3.1%
tagcloud: 5378.4ms +/- 3.0%
unpack-code: 862.4ms +/- 2.5%
validate-input: 12412.4ms +/- 2.6%
I don't have the post showing your original timings, but it seems you
are about half of what you reported before. That's better but still
pretty long. However, from what I've seen reported for this benchmark,
my timings are about 4 times longer than in those reports. So it could
be due to my older hardware not being able to punch through as many
instruction cycles per second as newer hardware used in those reports,
or I have more background processes running than they did. The same
would go for you regarding [old] hardware and lots of background
processes sucking up memory and/or CPU cycles.
As a last resort test, I'd reboot into Window's Safe Mode and disable
the anti-virus program (if still enabled) and retest to see if the
timing score got any better.
That all the Javascript tests pass regardless of how long they take
proves that Javascript is enabled in the web browser. Something else is
screwed up at the bank site. However, you said their tech said it was a
problem with [your] Java which is NOT a Javascript problem. I access a
couple of banks online and a few more over the years and haven't had one
that used Java. Its requirement puts a crimp in compatibility amongst
all their customers. Not all of them can install Java or have a
compatible version of it installed, like when at a resort and using
their computer room or going to Kinkos or a library to use their
computers where you're not allowed to install any software. For
accessibility by all their customers, they should be providing a
non-Java access method.
Did you uninstall ALL versions of JRE (Java Runtime Environment) and
then install just the latest JRE?
What version of IE are you using?
Dallas said:when i open explorer>program files>java this is all i see :
jre 1.6.0_04 file folder
jre 1.6.0_05 file folder
jre 1.6.0_07 file folder
jre6 file folder
Dallas said:question on paragraph 2; as usual, i am confused. i can disable the av
program without being in safe mode, or is it different disabling in normal
mode?
re: paragraph 4, currently in add/remove, i have:
java (tm) 6 update 14
"" "" 4
"" "" 5
I'll remove all 3 & go to java & install the latest update. but now that
begs this question from me; why does it only list those 3 updates but not
just plain old "java" by itself ?
VanguardLH said:The point wasn't to disable just the AV program. It was to disable
MOST of any startup programs, including the AV program, to provide a
cleaner environment under which to load the web browser and render
web pages.
Uninstall all versions of Java.
Delete the remnant C:\program files\java folder.
Install just the latest version of Java.