B
Brian A.
Anna said:Brian:
Since you didn't refer to a specific posting I'm uncertain if you're referring to
my response to the OP in which I touted the Casper 4.0 disk-cloning program and
provided details concerning its use.
To keep our conversation in perspective for others, I commented:
In the event your comment re "a sales pitch" does *not* refer to my post, then
please ignore the following...
However, if you *are* referring to my comments re the Casper 4.0 program, then let
me state the following...
I have absolutely no connection with the developer of that program - commercial or
otherwise. My comments are based solely on the experience we have had using that
program (together with the experience of other Casper 4.0 users with whom I'm
familiar) over the past year or so.
I'll take your word on that, I have no reason not to. However even if it may seem
minor, the use of terms such as "we've, we're, we" meaning as a team/group to me,
put's in the wrong perspective as I see it the way it was written in context.
As you may possibly have noted from my past postings, we have had extensive
experience using a variety of disk cloning/disk imaging programs over a period of
many years, including various versions of Symantec's Ghost & Acronis True Image
programs. I do not denigrate those programs (with the possible exception of some
earlier versions of the Ghost program) and have, on a number of occasions
recommended those programs when responding to posters' queries re
disk-cloning/disk-imaging programs.
Yes, I have read a number of you're responses in the past and they were very well
written, but the one I responded to appeared to me as marketing in the complete
written context as I read it. I do apologize if it has offended you and will try to
humbly say, so as not to offend again: re-reading the response still appears to me
as a one sided biased marketing ploy in the context it's written.
That statement of mine can be read out of context as well, it's not meant in any
way to offend which I wish it won't. Wishing may be better than hoping for me at the
moment.
We have, however, found the Casper 4.0 a superior disk-cloning program for the
detailed reasons I've indicated in my previous post. We highly recommend this
program to users who are casting about for a comprehensive backup program related
to disk-to- disk cloning operations. We have, however, always encouraged potential
users to insofar as possible try out various disk-cloning or other backup-type
programs to determine if one or the other programs meets their particular interest.
Anna
Perhaps I'm missing any mention of trying out any various other applications.
Again, I do not have any intent to offend you in any way, but I just don't see it in
the response, maybe it's me having a senior moment.
Once more I apologize for any offense taken.
--
Brian A. Sesko { MS MVP_Shell/User }
Conflicts start where information lacks.
http://basconotw.mvps.org/
Suggested posting do's/don'ts: http://www.dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
How to ask a question: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375