I think we might be misunderstanding what John actually meant. I think
that he was just pointing out the dangers of posting personal info and
that Steve's "got away with it" because of the nature and "membership" of
this forum - other forums may have some lurkers more inclined to act upon
such information. That's how I read it anyway, I didn't gleen anything
threatening ...
Thanks Keith, that was my intent. I would never encourage any action against
anyone ignoring the rules other than pointing out their transgressions. I
could have repeated what he had posted, but I just wanted to remind stevie
that he HAD posted personal information and that was not a good idea.
All stevie has to do is stop his soliciting and that would be it. I would
even consider seriously answering some of his questions. The trouble is
actually knowing when he has really stopped.
I applaud your vigilance where Steve's solicitations are concerned, but I
think there was room for misinterpretation in the instance I referenced, so
I pointed it out. That's all I was trying to do.
Ask a Question
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.