J
James_
Les said:Eh?
What the **** are you on about with font problems? Fonts look no different
to my 9700Pro using my 6800GT
PS I am using a dell P991 monitor
Les said:Eh?
What the **** are you on about with font problems? Fonts look no different
to my 9700Pro using my 6800GT
PS I am using a dell P991 monitor
Mike P said:Tour ps theories arew crap because what matters is the power rating on the
power rails of the ps. A cheap 400w will be outperformed by a good 300w
generally speaking. And I ran an overclocked 9800np on a antec 300w ps
with 2 hdd's 3 case fans 2cd drives and an xp2500@200x11 for months.
You seem to be regurgitating common myths repeated by people who don't
know what they're talking about.
Mike
I had no problems in Windows. I went from a Leadtek Ti-200 to an ATIAndrew said:What problem(s) are you having? I went from a 4400 to a 9700 Pro with
no problems, I use the 4.4 Cats.
GT-Force said:Hi,
I had an nVidia (GeForce2 GTS), now I have an ATI card (9700 Pro), and I
am thinking about going back to nVidia (6800GT). Is there anyone here that
went to nVidia from ATI and regretted it? If so, what was the old and the
new cards, and what were the issues?
Thanks.
GT
Chip said:GT, can I ask you:
What is your question????!?!??!?? Please can you re-state it? Everyone
is jumping in with answers, and yet we don't actually know what your
question is.
Your post says FROM nvidia TO ati
Your test says TO nvidia FROM ati
Mike P said:Ben C, I looked back but I can't see exactly what the problem is with your
card. <snip>
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/ati-powercons.html
Mike
GT-Force said:If you've read more than the topic, you sould have seen my question. Here
it is once more, for you:
"Is there anyone here that went to nVidia from ATI and regretted it? If
so, what was the old and the new cards, and what were the issues?"
I do not know, how clearer can I make it? Sorry...
the power rails of the ps. A cheap 400w will be outperformed by a
good 300w generally speaking. And I ran an overclocked 9800np on a
Richard said:On 22/10/04 5:39 PM, Inglo wrote: ....
I just ran it at those settings and I'm at about 60-70 fps, never higher
than 71 fps. VSync is off. I'm using the Condition Zero version of CS,
by the way.
Mike P said:What motherboard do you have? The generic MS drivers act like you
describe but should ID the card properly. It's the card not identifying
that is causing the driver install to fail as well I suspect.
I never unistall the MS drivers before putting the ATI in (the card is
ATI, not another brand?)
Try leaving the MS drivers in although I suspect the card id to be bad for
some reason. Was the card's bios ever flashed? Also try a good nvidia
driver cleaner and installing xpSP2... assuming you're using XP.. also
make sure you use the proper os (xp, 2k, etc) drivers.
It seems to me that the card may be bad, either a bad unit or a bad flash.
But I've never seen that arror in about 30 ATI builds I've done, I might
be missing something.
Mike
Scotter said:I *believe* the Radeon 9700 Pro is an entire generation of card newer than
the GeForce 4 cards so yeah, it should blow the Ti4600 out of the water.
Here is a link to a great driver deinstaller:
http://www.driverheaven.net/cleaner/
Barry Kelman said:I have just "upgraded" from Ti4600 to 9700pro and to be honest I don't see
muct improvement while playing Call of Duty or Medal of Honor.
Forgive my ignorance but where do you set FF anansio? Can anyone advise on
the setups the get max performance out of these 2 games with the 9700pro
Regards
Barry