P
Paul-B
LOL!Conor said:If that was the case, no vulnerabilities would exist in open source
software.
Stick with truck-driving, you might know a bit more about it.
LOL!Conor said:If that was the case, no vulnerabilities would exist in open source
software.
Another gay arseraping stalker.LOL!
Stick with truck-driving, you might know a bit more about it.
Conor said:Another gay arseraping stalker.
Paul-B said:Nope, not gay or arseraping... even if I was gay I wouldn't consider
that an insult. WEhat have you got against gays, bigot? Certainly not a
stalker, you talk as much crap here as you do in uac and other groups.
I've not seen you in uk.r.d or uk.tCertainly not a
stalker, you talk as much crap here as you do in uac and other groups.
MICHAEL said:source code, >>> > > right? I tend to think someone would identify
and publish back >>> > > doors that allow Canonical (or whoever) to
spy on users. >>> > > > If that was the case, no vulnerabilities
would exist in open >>> > source software.
While I think Charlie is out of line with his comment and has mental
issues of his own- you did intend to insult truck drivers. Those are
some of the hardest working people you will ever meet. The national
economies of the US, Canada, and Mexico would collapse without the
ability to move goods. In the big picture, truck drivers' services
are extremely important to the economy- more so than anything that
you do, I'm sure.
-Michael
Paul-B said:I wasn't talking to Charlie, check the attributions
MICHAEL said:Paul-B said:MICHAEL said:Conor wrote:
<[email protected]>, >>>>> > Charlie
Wilkes says... >>>>> > > > > > How do you know what back doors are
built into your >>beloved >>> > > > Ubuntu?
arseraping... even if I was gay I wouldn't consider >>> that an
insult. WEhat have you got against gays, bigot? Certainly >>> not a
stalker, you talk as much crap here as you do in uac and >>> other
groups.
My sincerest apologies to Charlie. I now see it was "Conor"
that looks to have made that comment. He or a moderator must
have removed his posts. Your reply seemed to be to Charlie.
-Michael
The "Lorry Driver" thing was because Conor is a lorry driver and as
such is a better lorry driver than an expert on operating systems, imo.
No offence to the lorry-driving fraternity, who I hold in the highest
regard.
Paul-B said:MICHAEL said:Paul-B said:MICHAEL wrote:
Conor wrote:
The "Lorry Driver" thing was because Conor is a lorry driver and as
such is a better lorry driver than an expert on operating systems, imo.
No offence to the lorry-driving fraternity, who I hold in the highest
regard.
Okay, that's cool.
Take care,
Michael
The "Lorry Driver" thing was because Conor is a lorry driver and as
such is a better lorry driver than an expert on operating systems, imo.
So why do you obviously think we can't do anything else? Why evenNo offence to the lorry-driving fraternity, who I hold in the highest
regard.
The "Lorry Driver" thing was because Conor is a lorry driver and as such
is a better lorry driver than an expert on operating systems, imo. No
offence to the lorry-driving fraternity, who I hold in the highest regard.