D
DevilsPGD
In message <[email protected]> Frank McCoy
Odd, I've never seen anything quite like that myself, and I've been
using DVI almost exclusively for several years now.
I've currently got a couple 24" monitors at 1920x1200, two 22" monitors
at 1680x1050, a 20" at 1680x1050, plus three non-widescreen LCDs.
In all cases, DVI cables are used, and in all cases the system can pull
the correct resolution (in no cases are larger resolutions shown as
options, unless I go to show all available resolutions)
A range of video cards, mostly NVidia, three ATIs and I believe an
onboard Intel video adapter in a box we tried for one of the kids.
So I've had good luck with DVI reporting back monitor type and correct
resolution to the system.
Three different (all ATI) adapters, two different computers, a DVI/DVI
cable, a DVI/VGA cable, and a DVI-to-VGA adapter. In all cases, with
the DVI cable or adapter in place, none of them could even be SET to
anything other than standard 4:3 resolutions. The same cards (except
the DVI-Only one work just fine with a VGA/VGA connector to the card.
Odd, I've never seen anything quite like that myself, and I've been
using DVI almost exclusively for several years now.
I've currently got a couple 24" monitors at 1920x1200, two 22" monitors
at 1680x1050, a 20" at 1680x1050, plus three non-widescreen LCDs.
In all cases, DVI cables are used, and in all cases the system can pull
the correct resolution (in no cases are larger resolutions shown as
options, unless I go to show all available resolutions)
A range of video cards, mostly NVidia, three ATIs and I believe an
onboard Intel video adapter in a box we tried for one of the kids.
So I've had good luck with DVI reporting back monitor type and correct
resolution to the system.