All's quiet on the western front

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tom Dacon
  • Start date Start date
Alias said:
Um, jerk off, I don't give a sh*t if MS takes my posts off their
servers. They're still on Google and thousands of other servers.

Alias

Guess what lying sheep-fukker, I too don't care...LOL!
Frank
 
Frank said:
Why do you care sheep-fukker?

I was hoping you would reply with an answer to help out your fellow
Vista sufferers.
You don't have Vista and you're too broke
to purchase Vista.

I have it sitting on a shelf. Want to buy it?
You're condemned to use that POS toy os urbuttoo.
Frank

I use XP every single day. Oops.

Alias
 
Alias said:
I was hoping you would reply with an answer to help out your fellow
Vista sufferers.

I'm replying to you sheep-fukker...do you have Vista? Oh...no you don't.
You hate MS and Vista and you're a known and admitted lying linux troll.
I have it sitting on a shelf. Want to buy it?

You mean you have a pirated copy that will no longer run and you're
trying of off it to some unsuspecting little old lady right?
I use XP every single day.

So you why do you need to have anything MS if you're so in love with
urbuttoo? Won't it run everything for you?

Oops.

Bigger oops sheep-fukker!
Frank
 
Alias said:
So, you're blowing a paper bull horn again. Everyone act surprised.

Alias

That would be you sheep-fukker...and guess what...not one person is
surprised.
You're stupid!...LOL!
Frank
 
Clear said:
Do you see this dream before or after the one with the sheep?

Do you have anything of value you'd like to bet on my little Vista vs XP
test capin' crunch?
Well...?
Frank
 
Not looking for trouble - in fact I had my fingers crossed that my innocuous
post wouldn't cause any - it was just such a nice change to see peace around
here that I wanted to share my observation. Might have bee a mistake, since
it looks like there's been a little flare-up on this thread, which wasn't my
intention at all. But at least they're shouting at each other, instead of
ladling their vitriol out to the group at large.

Wish I'd kept my mouth shut and just enjoyed the peace and quiet, though. I
won't make that mistake again.

Tom
 
Frank said:
Do you have anything of value you'd like to bet on my little Vista vs XP
test capin' crunch?
Well...?
Frank

Depends on what you mean by faster. Vista does open apps faster than XP,
but XP blows Vista's doors off in local and network file management.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Former Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"
 
Alias said:
Yeah, in the fantasy, Frank *is* Bo Peep.

Alias

hehehe...what's wrong sheep-fukker? Getting excited every time someone
else mentions 'sheep"?...LOL!
Frank
 
kurttrail said:
Depends on what you mean by faster. Vista does open apps faster than XP,
but XP blows Vista's doors off in local and network file management.

And Angelical is faster than either one.

Alias
 
Tom said:
Not looking for trouble - in fact I had my fingers crossed that my
innocuous post wouldn't cause any - it was just such a nice change to
see peace around here that I wanted to share my observation. Might have
bee a mistake, since it looks like there's been a little flare-up on
this thread, which wasn't my intention at all. But at least they're
shouting at each other, instead of ladling their vitriol out to the
group at large.

Wish I'd kept my mouth shut and just enjoyed the peace and quiet,
though. I won't make that mistake again.

Although it's a lesson that I need to re-learn from time to time, it's
best not to tempt fate. That b*tch, Fate, has no self-control.

Have a good one, Tom! :)

--
Peace!
Kurt
Former Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"
 
Alias said:
And Angelical is faster than either one.

Alias

You do have trouble focusing on the subject matter...Vista...right?
But, seeing as how you don't have Vista, we do understand.
Frank
 
Do you have anything of value you'd like to bet on my little Vista vs XP
test capin' crunch?
Well...?
Frank


Lets see, should we listen to a crude butt sniffing little rodent
named Frank or go to Tom's Hardware and see what actual results show?

You decide: The details have many more pages, following is their
summary

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/xp-vs-vista,1531-11.html

Conclusion:
Windows Vista clearly is not a great new performer when it comes to
executing single applications at maximum speed. Although we only
looked at the 32-bit version of Windows Vista Enterprise, we do not
expect the 64-bit edition to be faster (at least not with 32-bit
applications).

Overall, applications performed as expected, or executed slightly
slower than under Windows XP. The synthetic benchmarks such as
Everest, PCMark05 or Sandra 2007 show that differences are
non-existent on a component level. We also found some programs that
refused to work, and others that seem to cause problems at first but
eventually ran properly. In any case, we recommend watching for
Vista-related software upgrades from your software vendors.

There are some programs that showed deeply disappointing performance.
Unreal Tournament 2004 and the professional graphics benchmarking
suite SPECviewperf 9.03 suffered heavily from the lack of support for
the OpenGL graphics library under Windows Vista. This is something we
expected, and we clearly advise against replacing Windows XP with
Windows Vista if you need to run professional graphics applications.
Both ATI and Nvidia will offer OpenGL support in upcoming driver
releases, but it remains to be seen if and how other graphics vendors
or Microsoft may offer it.

We are disappointed that CPU-intensive applications such as video
transcoding with XviD (DVD to XviD MPEG4) or the MainConcept H.264
Encoder performed 18% to nearly 24% slower in our standard benchmark
scenarios. Both benchmarks finished much quicker under Windows XP.
There aren't newer versions available, and we don't see immediate
solutions to this issue.
 
Not looking for trouble - in fact I had my fingers crossed that my innocuous
post wouldn't cause any - it was just such a nice change to see peace around
here that I wanted to share my observation. Might have bee a mistake, since
it looks like there's been a little flare-up on this thread, which wasn't my
intention at all. But at least they're shouting at each other, instead of
ladling their vitriol out to the group at large.

Wish I'd kept my mouth shut and just enjoyed the peace and quiet, though. I
won't make that mistake again.

Noise level is relative. More experienced posters are well aware ALL
Microsoft so-called "support" groups like this frequently have
resident trolls. Here it is the village idiot Frank that likes to sit
on his imaginary throne and hold court because he's actually nuts
enough to think Microsoft wants him to and that he'll somehow be
rewarded for his efforts.

You got to be a special kind of stupid to be that dumb, but anyone
reading just a handful of Frank's rants often sprinkled with bizarre
sexual fantasies over sheep knows he qualifies on that score. Frank is
beyond reach of any conventional therapy. He's crackers through and
through, plus he's a compulsive pathological liar.

These kind of groups also tend to draw control freaks...like certain
MVPs who can't resist trying to play net cop in various ways.

If you know a certain amount of noise will always be made by these
jerks and those responding to them, in my case just for the fun of it,
then you can either "play along" and be amused by it or somehow find
the willpower to simply skip over such posts. Of course that requires
being adult, something beyond a lot of posters that frequent this
newsgroup.

What I always find devilishly amusing is those that whine and
complaint the loudest about the noise always make most of it
themselves.
 
Frank said:
You do have trouble focusing on the subject matter...Vista...right?
But, seeing as how you don't have Vista, we do understand.
Frank

Angelical includes Vista. Oops. Course, if you don't speak Spanish, you
won't be able to use Angelical. Oh, and your ignorance is showing again.

Alias
 
Alias said:
Angelical includes Vista. Oops.
Course, if you don't speak Spanish, you
won't be able to use Angelical. Oh, and your ignorance is showing again.

Alias

Oh I've seen your post asking about angelical. It's not Vista, so stop
your lying for once ok?
Frank
 
Back
Top