M
MooseFET
Darn! Before I even got the patent written, someone else thinks of
it.
Darn! Before I even got the patent written, someone else thinks of
it.
M
MooseFET
My ZX-81 had neither and booted way faster than any Windoze machine
does.
These days, a few gig of FLASH is well with the budget. A µPD448012
RAM or two would give enough memory to run reasonable applications.
Today, a "PC" could be made that needed no fan or disks and was low
cost. It could do everything most users need a PC to do. It could
come preinstalled with FreeCell, a Web browser, some email program and
an image of the blue screen of death. That last one is to ensure that
most users never realize that this isn't a full up PC running Windows.
T
The little lost angel
So in other words, your machine that does not store data will now have
to store data about instruments?
Well, if you truly believe in that, then I would have to say you're
delusional
So again tihs PC that does not need to store any information has to
store upgrades information.
But you said it doesn't need to store any information.
Ok then what's the practical implication/advantage/whatever of what
you're proposing?
A
Anthony Fremont
The said:
There is none. YHBT His posts are even blocked from appearing on
Supernews. They didn't used to be, that was until the flood anyway.
Hmmmmmmm........
R
Radium
Digital electrical generators. Similar to hardware digital tone
generators except it produces digital electric signals corresponding
to data other than tones. It's a hard-wired PC. Read the Wiki-quotes
and my responses to them.
quotes from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microcode :
"Each machine instruction (add, shift, move) was implemented directly
with circuitry. This provided fast performance, but as instruction
sets grew more complex, hard-wired instruction sets became more
difficult to design and debug."
I still prefer the "hard-wired instruction sets"
"a bug could often be fixed by replacing a portion of the microprogram
rather than by changes being made to hardware logic and wiring."
But I still prefer the "hardware logic and wiring".
R
Radium
Well, if you truly believe in that, then I would have to say you're
delusional
Yes, it stores info in the form of RAM. It does not need ROM, though.
However, my dream PC does have the ability to write/read ROM in the
form of optical discs [e.g. CDs/DVDs].
But you said it doesn't need to store any information.
Sorry. I meant to say, it does not store any ROM [except for optical
discs].
What would normally be stored in ROM, my PC generates in real-time.
The RAM chips store what would normally be stored in the magnetic
platters of an HDD.
As I said before, parallel-Hz allows massively-serial devices to
operate at extremely high clock rates without needing any cooling
equipment.
B
Bob Myers
Radium said:
Yes, you've SAID that before, but you have yet to give
any indication at all that it means anything. As usual,
you not only have no clue, you're running a significant
deficit....
Bob M.
R
Radium
How does it not mean anything?
M
MooseFET
Sniglet forb madious glurm hort blashim. Fertum digital madious three
phase therefor, the three phase clock massively paces any glurm hort.
B
Bob Myers
Radium said:
Just your usual talent at expressing yourself, I guess.
Bob M.
R
Radium
So you don't think it's important to keep circuits from overheating?
FYI, serial processors running extremely high clock rates without
cooling equipment, can easily fry. Either you need a cooling system or
parallel-Hz. I would like the latter since I want my PC to have the
least amount of moving parts.
B
Bob Myers
Radium said:
Sure it is. But you clearly don't have a clue about how
to do that.
I do realize that you're a troll - I would just like you to consider
becoming a more amusing one.
Bob M.
D
Donald
Why aren't you laughing all the way to the bank ??Radium said:
You have nothing,
good bye
R
Radium
Use parallel-Hz. Simple.
No offense but I would appreciate serious responses to my questions.
Please leave out the dark humor.
D
Don Bowey
How do you plan to use the 1 Hz. Clock pulses? Just give us an example of
HOW you will use a few of the one pps clock lines to achieve anything useful
at a rate exceeding one pps.
You aren't a serious enough troll.
M
MooseFET
FYI: 1 billion processors all losing 1mW is still 1KW ow power being
turned into heat. As you have already been told, the leakage current
alone will destroy your system. Your idea doesn't work.
R
Radium
Couldn't circuitry be designed in such a way that the leakage current
will travel in a path out of the system, instead of toward vital
circuits?
K
kony
It's not important to fixate on it like you need some change
instead of just learning how world+dog does it already.
You constantly demonstrate an inability to use current tech.
That is not a sign you have some advanced insight, it is a
sign you have a lot to work to do to merely become up to
speed with everyone else.
M
martin griffith
D
DaveM
Radium said:
You still don't get it, do you?
Show the physical layout of the clocking circuit on a PCB. You're suggesting
that you can build a computer having a BILLION individual clock lines, each
running at 1pps?? That's just for 1GHz... How many clock lines does that
figure out to be if you wanted to speed up the computer to 4GHz?
LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
--
Dave M
MasonDG44 at comcast dot net (Just substitute the appropriate characters in the
address)
Life is like a roll of toilet paper; the closer to the end, the faster it goes.