W
...winston
Reasoning with someone reading between the lines is futile.
No mention of dual booting is present or inferred only that a valid license is required.
You've a valid license for XP(still in use), a valid install of RC1 to use and replace per Msft's approval to install an upgrade version of Vista(now in use)....what more clarification is necessary ?
Since you've also mentioned a line about a fairly sizeable installed Window base company...it would seem that volume licensing would be in play(if not, your company needs a new IT manager soon). Volume licensing contractual requirements can be modified with supplements and/or addendums, or new contracts to modify or even limit the EULA.
...winston
: Mike, I should explain that I agree wholeheartedly with what you are saying:
:
: (1) As written, the EULA does not allow dual-booting (the upgraded and
: un-upgraded versions) from an upgrade license;
:
: (2) People have an obligation to follow the EULA whether or not the software
: actually requires them to. (It looks like most or all releases of Vista
: have the same install procedure, which allows some things other than what
: the particular EULA actually permits. These might be useful for rescuing
: situations where the license is valid but the software can't easily verify
: it; but they do not warrant violating the EULA.)
:
: The question I was speculating about is whether Microsoft actually intended
: for the EULA to work this way, since many manufacturers' upgrade EULAs work
: quite differently, and there have already been other updates to the Vista
: EULA to permit things that were originally prohibited. I will be contacting
: Microsoft to see if they've had anything further to say about it.
:
:
:
No mention of dual booting is present or inferred only that a valid license is required.
You've a valid license for XP(still in use), a valid install of RC1 to use and replace per Msft's approval to install an upgrade version of Vista(now in use)....what more clarification is necessary ?
Since you've also mentioned a line about a fairly sizeable installed Window base company...it would seem that volume licensing would be in play(if not, your company needs a new IT manager soon). Volume licensing contractual requirements can be modified with supplements and/or addendums, or new contracts to modify or even limit the EULA.
...winston
: Mike, I should explain that I agree wholeheartedly with what you are saying:
:
: (1) As written, the EULA does not allow dual-booting (the upgraded and
: un-upgraded versions) from an upgrade license;
:
: (2) People have an obligation to follow the EULA whether or not the software
: actually requires them to. (It looks like most or all releases of Vista
: have the same install procedure, which allows some things other than what
: the particular EULA actually permits. These might be useful for rescuing
: situations where the license is valid but the software can't easily verify
: it; but they do not warrant violating the EULA.)
:
: The question I was speculating about is whether Microsoft actually intended
: for the EULA to work this way, since many manufacturers' upgrade EULAs work
: quite differently, and there have already been other updates to the Vista
: EULA to permit things that were originally prohibited. I will be contacting
: Microsoft to see if they've had anything further to say about it.
:
:
: