Ben Pope said:
The mistake was not making it clear enough wht they did. I do also disagree
with the practice of calling them Pros, but I didn't realise that the boxes
had "128bit memory interface" written on them either. Not that that helps
the average consumer.
In which country? If the box says 128bit all over it, then they're hardly
lying.
Ben
It certainly IS lying. ATI has certain standards for a card to be named a
9800 PRO. Sticking a tiny label on the box that says 128 bit does NOT then
permit you to call a 9800 SE card a 9800 PRO card. And I would suggest that
in the US of A a class action lawsuit would work very well...
The problem is that the 128 bit was NOT written on every package. Putting
that larger 128 bit label on forthcoming boxes is their supposed remedy for
this situation. Here is the problem as I see it. To the average consumer 128
bit does not mean much...after all that is double 64 bit and could be
misconstrued as being an 'improvement'. What the average consumer DOES
understand is 9800 PRO...*that* they can relate to, because that means
something...they see it printed on retail boxed products, and they know that
a pro is better than a plain 9800, and that a 9800SE is a lower grade than a
9800. The specific card that I saw was an OEM product..absolutely NO mention
of 128 bit interface anyplace...and it had the very same label as my genuine
9800 PRO....a purchaser...and indeed the seller...had NO way to know this
was a lesser card. *That* is fraudulent marketing...end of story...
What Sapphire did is no different that a jeweller taking a one carat
crystal...labeling it as a one carat diamond and selling it for thousands of
dollars. It is still a piece of crystal and the purchaser HAS been
cheated....this is soooooo simple.
M