4 Myths of Registry Cleaning

[Twayne]

So you can't produce data which shows that registry cleaners do what
they claim?

Like I said, I can't help with your reading comprehension problems.
Acting like an idiot won't change that.

 

[Mike Hall - MVP]

Like I said, I can't help with your reading comprehension problems. Acting
like an idiot won't change that.

Find somebody else to fool around with. I am done with this until such time
as you can produce any data which proves your claims..


--
Mike Hall - MVP
How to construct a good post..
http://dts-l.com/goodpost.htm
How to use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups..
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?pr=newswhelp&style=toc
Mike's Window - My Blog..
http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx

 

[Mike Hall - MVP]

Already done, as now explained about 4 times. I can't help that you cannot
comprehend what you read. If you want to know what it was, you go look it
up. Otherwise you've not a leg to stand on.
When I get answers to my original questions, then maybe, but like I
said, it's already there. Bruce didn't/couldn't even refute it; he just
black holed instead, so I'd consider that pretty good evidence in and of
itself, actually. I actually have the supporting information for my
claims, unlike those of the opposite camp who have nada, zip, nothing,
zero, useful information.

All you have done is provided a sales pitch.. not good enough..


--
Mike Hall - MVP
How to construct a good post..
http://dts-l.com/goodpost.htm
How to use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups..
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?pr=newswhelp&style=toc
Mike's Window - My Blog..
http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx

 

[Bruce Chambers]

...

Obviously I can, yes. And have in the past.

No, you've *NEVER* offered anything but wirthless advertising copy.

I've even made an offer to
run side by side tests of cleaners along with Bruce (or anyone else who
wishes to participate) and post the results after we set up the rules to
work to and type of damage to create. I openly challenged Bruce
Chambers to same; and guess what his response was?

Missed the challenge, but I'll be honest and say up front that I've no
need to repeat tests I did long ago. Until you produce real evidence
that there's any reason, whatsoever, to re-evaluate, I'll continue using
my time more productively.

What got me onto that was his incessantly posted boilerplate posts on
registry cleaners.

Why produce new answers to the same old question, when nothing's changed?

At first, likely almost 2 years ago now, I asked
him clarification questions.

No, you didn't. (Unless, like other trolls, you frequently change your
"handle," and had asked as someone else.)

I don't need to know your history anymore than I do anyne else's. My
"agenda" is simply to correct misinformation ...

By posting nothing but mis-information? Do you work for the Bush
administration, by any chance?





--

Bruce Chambers

Help us help you:


http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/555375

They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. ~Bertrand Russell

The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the priest has
killed a great many philosophers.
~ Denis Diderot

 

[Bruce Chambers]

Already done, as now explained about 4 times.

No, *NEVER* done.

I can't help that you
cannot comprehend what you read.

And we can't help it if you think advertising and/marketiung drivel
should be taken seriously in a technical discussion.


If you want to know what it was, you go

look it up. Otherwise you've not a leg to stand on.
When I get answers to my original questions, then maybe, but like I
said, it's already there. Bruce didn't/couldn't even refute it;

You've *NEVER* offered anything but advertising copy. There's nothing
to refute, there.


--

Bruce Chambers

Help us help you:


http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/555375

They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. ~Bertrand Russell

The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the priest has
killed a great many philosophers.
~ Denis Diderot

 

[Twayne]

All you have done is provided a sales pitch.. not good enough..

Like I said ... already done. Typical closed minded response, I'm
afraid.
You're one of those who expect the world handed to you and that's not
reality; sorry about that. You do have to take some responsibility for
yourself and your own edification at times and quit relying on others to
simply hand it to you. You could locate reams more information on the
subject if you were inclined to try, IMO. Most anyone could. So ...

 

[Twayne]

Find somebody else to fool around with. I am done with this until
such time as you can produce any data which proves your claims..

I have done nothing but respond to your own posts. If you don't want
responses, don't post. It's really that simple.

Twayne

 

[Mike Hall - MVP]

I have done nothing but respond to your own posts. If you don't want
responses, don't post. It's really that simple.

Twayne

What you have failed to do is provide real data which substantiates your
claim that registry cleaners have value..


--
Mike Hall - MVP
How to construct a good post..
http://dts-l.com/goodpost.htm
How to use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups..
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?pr=newswhelp&style=toc
Mike's Window - My Blog..
http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx

 

[Marianne]

Like I said ... already done. Typical closed minded response, I'm
afraid.
You're one of those who expect the world handed to you and that's not
reality; sorry about that. You do have to take some responsibility for
yourself and your own edification at times and quit relying on others to
simply hand it to you. You could locate reams more information on the
subject if you were inclined to try, IMO. Most anyone could. So ...

Oh get lost you creep! Other than proving that you are a complete fool
and an ignorant troll you have not been able to give any credence to any
of your claims. Around here we call people like you a waste of oxygen.

M

 

[Twayne]

No, you've *NEVER* offered anything but wirthless advertising copy.

Too lazy to look, huh?

Missed the challenge, but I'll be honest and say up front that I've no
need to repeat tests I did long ago. Until you produce real evidence
that there's any reason, whatsoever, to re-evaluate, I'll continue
using my time more productively.

No, you're not being honest. Honesty has been shown to be something you
don't practice. Esp the way you contradict yourself from place to
place.

Why produce new answers to the same old question, when nothing's
changed?

Because YOU do not posess those answers. I doubt you even have more
than one empirical case of such events as you profess in these posts.
And you know that such activity would expose you as being wrong. It's
like your ego and narcissistic levels won't allow you to even privately
know you're wrong sometimes, and at other times you get irrittated and
rather than help anything you bury your head .

No, you didn't. (Unless, like other trolls, you frequently change
your "handle," and had asked as someone else.)

Oh, yes, I did. And it's there in the archives if you want to look for
it. See, this is one of your many contradictory statements; if you
looked for it, then you would have also seen the challenge posts you
intimate you have never seen. As ever, you simply continue to try to
weasel your words to mean what you want them to mean, not the reality of
anything to do with the subject at hand, which is essentially that no
registry cleaner is any good.

Then why were you trying to direct me to your past record as you did.

By posting nothing but mis-information? Do you work for the Bush
administration, by any chance?

Nope, by correcting the misinformation posted by others, in this case
meaning the misinformation that registry cleaners are never useful,
never accomplish anything good, more often than not screw up the system,
and should never be used and other similar tripe spewed here by you.
There is a world of information at your fingertips if your "expertise"
is to be believed, and yet you cannot allow yourself to see it or allow
any ray of light into that closed mind of yours.

Why don't you go on topic and make a sensible defense? Oh, never mind,
I know why.

 

[Twayne]

No, *NEVER* done.

That one's really gotten to you, hasn't it? Yes, done, and even exists
in my archives. It's sad a person can be as ignorant as you and go so
off topic for so long. When you provide something useful then I'll pull
out those papers and articles. Until then there is no need to because
thinking people have read enough here and on their own to know what the
situation is. You're more like a wart on the ass of progress than
anything else these days.