Windows XP 3D Mark 2006 Scores

CITech said:
OK, I succumbed! I gave up valuable crunching time to try the tests, and I got me some results.

The only problem is ....... I have no idea how to interpret them ! *the geek slopes away to the corner to hide his embarrassed face!*

Before I post, will someone tell me which way they work. Is a high score good or bad? Who cares, here's the results anyway, but I'd still like an interpretation.

Ta muchly!

Edit: And just incase anyone cares, I didn't switch off any services or utilities apart from WCG ....
Click to expand...
WOW :eek:

That is GOOD! Higher is better!
 
CITech said:
OK, I succumbed! I gave up valuable crunching time to try the tests, and I got me some results.

The only problem is ....... I have no idea how to interpret them ! *the geek slopes away to the corner to hide his embarrassed face!*

Before I post, will someone tell me which way they work. Is a high score good or bad? Who cares, here's the results anyway, but I'd still like an interpretation.

Ta muchly!

Edit: And just incase anyone cares, I didn't switch off any services or utilities apart from WCG ....
Click to expand...

I knew it was gonna kick some a**!! Nice one CI!!! :thumb:

That be very good! :cool:
 
CITech said:
Edit: And just incase anyone cares, I didn't switch off any services or utilities apart from WCG ....
Click to expand...
I'd be interested in a rematch WITH WCG running ... :D

Just to show a point really ... WCG 'should' not interfere.

Good score. :thumb:


* that should keep me in front for another day *
 
muckshifter said:
I'd be interested in a rematch WITH WCG running ... :D

Just to show a point really ... WCG 'should' not interfere.

Good score. :thumb:


* that should keep me in front for another day *
Click to expand...
Scores with WCG running on both cores! Not bad eh ....... :p

Anything else you can think of me slow down my crunching Mucks? :D
 

Attachments

  • 3D Mark 2006 (2).webp
    3D Mark 2006 (2).webp
    15.8 KB · Views: 111
That score is awesome what fps were you getting , if you can remember ?:thumb:
 
Rush said:
That score is awesome what fps were you getting , if you can remember ?:thumb:
Click to expand...
I wasn't watching, I had to undertake another vital operation whilst the system was out of action!:eek:

The kettle had just finished boiling ............. ;)
 
CITech said:
Scores with WCG running on both cores! Not bad eh ....... :p

Anything else you can think of me slow down my crunching Mucks? :D
Click to expand...
Naw ... I would rather have you crunching than appeasing a "silly" benchmark program. ;)

And you are more than welcome to stay "in front" ... if you can. :p
 
Rush said:
Was the kettle connected by USB ? :D
Click to expand...
No I heard of the horror story when one of the other forum members tried to plug in his USB cup warmer and blew up his system. Can't be sure but I think Mr Imrie rings a bell?

Muckshifter said:
And you are more than welcome to stay "in front" ... if you can. :p
Click to expand...
I somehow think you have still got the edge on me today. ( I wonder why :confused: )
 
Its good to see WCG has no effect on gaming! As i knew anyway, but its good to get a second opinion!

Another excuse not to crunch blown out of the water!! :D
 
Vanilla Radio said:
Its Another excuse not to crunch blown out of the water!! :D
Click to expand...
Exactly! Who needs those American Mythbusters off the TV!:D
 
that is the toughest benchmark ever :O

i dot hold much hope out for 3000 points for the new system then :P

current one managed 1150 in 3dmark05

im not even going to try it there :P
 
Back
Top