D
Dale
Nope. I started with one gig - a pair of 512MB sticks and doubled by adding
a second pair of 512MB sticks.
Dale
a second pair of 512MB sticks.
Dale
Look into x1300 or x1600 -- make sure your case has adequate coolingMy Video card drops me to a 3.7 score because of gaming graphics. The Radeon
x600 is only 3.9.
Will prolly upgrade that too. Any suggestions?
Under "What is Rated" for the Memory Score, it says "Memory operations per
second." Why should doubling the amount of RAM have any effect on the memory
speed?
BSchnur said:It might well if the original memory was a single module and the
upgrade was to two match modules using the DDR2 doubled data rate.
Dale said:I've heard the same results as mine from other posters: More RAM -
higher score.
As my other post said, I started out with 2 sticks of 512MB in a pair
and added a second pair of 2 sticks of 512MB.
OK -- I'm assuming that the first pair was installed to operate at 128score.
As my other post said, I started out with 2 sticks of 512MB in a pair and
added a second pair of 2 sticks of 512MB.
BSchnur said:OK -- I'm assuming that the first pair was installed to operate at 128
bit. I've seen some boards that have four slots and don't make it
clear how the pairs are oriented, so that if one pair isn't placed
properly (and re-checked at POST), when you added a second pair, you
actually 'paired' the original two single modules.
That being said, it is apparent that Vista will be 'happier' (ie
perform better) with 2G versus 1G.
Ken Blake said:Sure. That's never been at issue. My only question had to do with the
Windows Vista "score," which Vista defines as "Memory operations per
second." I asked "Why should doubling the amount of RAM have any effect on
the memory speed?"
Ken
Understood -- I guess for me, I'd look at the Sandra scores instead ofSure. That's never been at issue. My only question had to do with the
Windows Vista "score," which Vista defines as "Memory operations per
second." I asked "Why should doubling the amount of RAM have any effect on
the memory speed?"
Nope. You assume wrong. I understand the pairing of memory on the
motherboard and, along with that knowledge, followed the instructions in the
book.
BSchnur said:Understood -- I guess for me, I'd look at the Sandra scores instead of
Microsoft to get more precision on this.
I will also check out the score differences when I move from a matched
pair of 512m modules to a matched pair of 1G modules in one of my
Vista systems in the near future.
BSchnur said:Ken, I am expecting to get a memory matched pair of Kingston DDR2 667
1G modules this week. What I hope to do is use them to replace a pair
of memory matched DDR2 533 512M modules on a Vista system. So I will
have two variables -- memory module speed and amount of memory. I
will run both the Sandra memory benchmarks and the Microsoft test
before and after and will post results. Might be this coming weekend.