Well, I am using Outlook Express and can see the whole subject line (@
1280X1024)
--
Mike Matheny
Hi Alan,
Obviously I Was able to read the full subject line other wise my
respone
would have made no sense. I just think full messages in the subject
line
are
poor form. In this case the subject line was in fact completely
different
from the body of the message:
:
Oh well, I have to kick off a manual scan every 3 days because the
same
brain dead app doesn't know it RAN a scan less than 12 hours before!
The gentleman is having problems getting WD to scan/remember scans so
extended his gripe (legitimate as it may be) to "Oh, and it appears
that
this
brain dead app can't even update itself" [This is not a quote, this is
my
reading of the post].
By the way, reading this group using IE6 the only way I can see the
full
subject line in a case like this is to open the message in a new
window.
Happy Holidays Alan,
?
Tim
:
Hi Tim,
Well, to be fair to the original poster, if you open the message,
click
in
the Subject line, and then press the "End" key on the keyboard, you
can
see
the end of the Subject line.
It reads: "You know, it's awfully strange that someone has to
CONTINUOUSLY
post signature updates here for a system that should be updating
automatically!"
I'm not saying I agree with the OP's message though. :>
Alan
The updates are posted here for 3 main reasons.
Those who are behind firewalls or systems that will not allow the
updates.
Those who download them on a fast connection at work and bring them
home.
Those who do not want Windows Update to create System Restore
Points.
By the way, please do not post subject lines that are so long they
cannot
be
read with out playing around with them. The most I could see of your
suject
line was:
You know, it's awfully strange that someone has to CONTINUOUSLY post
signature updates h...
and that was by shrinking my message box. Before that the most I
could
read
was:
You know, it's awfully strange that someone has to...
If people cannot read your subject line they are less likely to
reply.
?:-\
Tim
Geek w/o Portfolio