XP & Vista swapfiles on separate disc

  • Thread starter Thread starter DrTeeth
  • Start date Start date
D

DrTeeth

Is there really some performance increase to be had by having the swap
file on a separate hard disc?

TBH, I did not notice much difference when I tried that configuration
in the past, but them again, I tend not to hammer my physical memory
to zilch.

--
Cheers,

DrT

"If you want to find out what is wrong
with democracy, spend five minutes with
the average voter." - Winston Churchill
 
With contemporary hard disk technology I do not believe you will notice
any difference at all in performance or reliability.
 
With contemporary hard disk technology I do not believe you will notice
any difference at all in performance or reliability.
Click to expand...

TBH, that is my gut feeling. It seems to be one of those oft given
pieces of advice, which though plausible, don't amount to much (like
clearing out the prefetch folder <rolls eyes>).

Thanks.

--
Cheers,

DrT

** Stress - the condition brought about by having to
** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights
** out of someone who richly deserves it.
 
At one time, years ago, that was probably good advice (for the
technically inclined.) We have to keep up with the times. ;-)
 
Is there really some performance increase to be had by having the swap
file on a separate hard disc?
Click to expand...


Possibly, if it's on a separate *physical* disk. No, if it's on a
second partition on your only physical disk.

But if you have enough RAM so that the swap file is hardly ever used,
it makes very little difference where you put it.
 
Thanks Ken.

--
Cheers,

DrT

** Stress - the condition brought about by having to
** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights
** out of someone who richly deserves it.
 
Back
Top