B
bards1888
Up until now I've been an AMD supporter, probaly because they *used* to
offer a far better price performance ratio over intel cpus, This is
definately not the case now. I have 4 athlon 64 based machines and only
1 intel. However I think conroe is going to change all of that. It would
appear that intel will be offering the best 'price perfomance' ratio
when conroe arrives.
I'm just speccing a replacement desktop and I'd like to go dual core.
The X2 3800 is very expensive here in Australia @ $450 (its probably the
only one I can afford). Given that there is rumoured to be a price drop
the day after conroe, I'm planning on waiting 'til then before deciding
what to buy. Given the conroe performance benchmarks that we've all no
doubt seen, I think I may be tempted for one of the lower priced
conroes, which should destroy the X2 3800 in most tasks if the
benchmarks are accurate.
I think AMD is gambling/hoping that intel can't ramp-up conroe quickly
enough. This could backfire disasterously if intel manages to pull it off.
how many of you are waiting until conroe comes out to then buy an X2 ?
how many of you are going to buy a conroe ?
how many of you think AMD need to reduce prices of not just the X2 3800
but all the X2 given they are all going to be soundly beaten by conroe ?
who thinks the X2 3600 will be a waster of time ? why would a 2 x 256k
cache dual core be introduced near conroe ?
Who is dissapointed that 4x4 is only going to be for Athlon FX ? How
many people can afford to $1500 processors in a PC ?
I hope for my sake (as a consumer) that Intel pulls it off and really
gives AMD a shake up. They really have rested on their laurels IMHO.
offer a far better price performance ratio over intel cpus, This is
definately not the case now. I have 4 athlon 64 based machines and only
1 intel. However I think conroe is going to change all of that. It would
appear that intel will be offering the best 'price perfomance' ratio
when conroe arrives.
I'm just speccing a replacement desktop and I'd like to go dual core.
The X2 3800 is very expensive here in Australia @ $450 (its probably the
only one I can afford). Given that there is rumoured to be a price drop
the day after conroe, I'm planning on waiting 'til then before deciding
what to buy. Given the conroe performance benchmarks that we've all no
doubt seen, I think I may be tempted for one of the lower priced
conroes, which should destroy the X2 3800 in most tasks if the
benchmarks are accurate.
I think AMD is gambling/hoping that intel can't ramp-up conroe quickly
enough. This could backfire disasterously if intel manages to pull it off.
how many of you are waiting until conroe comes out to then buy an X2 ?
how many of you are going to buy a conroe ?
how many of you think AMD need to reduce prices of not just the X2 3800
but all the X2 given they are all going to be soundly beaten by conroe ?
who thinks the X2 3600 will be a waster of time ? why would a 2 x 256k
cache dual core be introduced near conroe ?
Who is dissapointed that 4x4 is only going to be for Athlon FX ? How
many people can afford to $1500 processors in a PC ?
I hope for my sake (as a consumer) that Intel pulls it off and really
gives AMD a shake up. They really have rested on their laurels IMHO.