L
Larry K. Reynolds
I bought a Gigabyte 8KNXP which has an integrated IntelPro1000 NIC. OS is
XP under NTFS but I figure same issue in W2K. Connected to a workgroup
(home) with 4 computers all fed to a cable internet connection through a
Linksys Router/Switch. The gateway is 192.168.1.1 (very common) and the
Linksys acts as the DHCP Server. Under the TCP/IP properties, everything is
set up to automatically get the lease for the DNS address to be assigned by
the DHCP server. It fails and the event viewer indicates "the IP lease
0.0.0.0 for the network card ... has been denied by the DHCP server
192.168.1.1 (the DHCP server sent a DHCPNACK message). So, I hard coded the
addresses for both the LAN and the WAN under the TCP/IP properties and they
all worked. Of course, the problem is that I do not have "hard" DNS
addresses from the service provider and must get back to the DHCP protocol.
Although logic tells me it is not the hardware, what else could it be? It
is not Winsock in the registry (tried that too by putting a known good
reference in the registry since such might have become corrupted!). Any
thoughts would be appreciated.
Regards - Larry K. Reynolds - Riverside, CA
XP under NTFS but I figure same issue in W2K. Connected to a workgroup
(home) with 4 computers all fed to a cable internet connection through a
Linksys Router/Switch. The gateway is 192.168.1.1 (very common) and the
Linksys acts as the DHCP Server. Under the TCP/IP properties, everything is
set up to automatically get the lease for the DNS address to be assigned by
the DHCP server. It fails and the event viewer indicates "the IP lease
0.0.0.0 for the network card ... has been denied by the DHCP server
192.168.1.1 (the DHCP server sent a DHCPNACK message). So, I hard coded the
addresses for both the LAN and the WAN under the TCP/IP properties and they
all worked. Of course, the problem is that I do not have "hard" DNS
addresses from the service provider and must get back to the DHCP protocol.
Although logic tells me it is not the hardware, what else could it be? It
is not Winsock in the registry (tried that too by putting a known good
reference in the registry since such might have become corrupted!). Any
thoughts would be appreciated.
Regards - Larry K. Reynolds - Riverside, CA