Grinder said:
Oh, I found this article from microsoft that appears relevant, if not
particularly helpful:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/837123
Agree absolutely. There are ways to design the PCB in the laptop
(or in a desktop computer for that matter), to make it more
resistant to interference. For example, one desktop board had
the Ethernet diff pairs routed right next to the audio signals,
which is a no-no. (Any time there was network activity, there was
noise in the audio, which could have been caught during product
verification.) Normally, there are clearance rules you are
supposed to use, for the audio with respect to other things.
Desktop motherboards go through two or three design cycles, so
there is ample opportunity to catch mistakes.
While soldering a Faraday cage above the audio circuit may seem
like the perfect solution, there are still ways for interference
to get in (i.e. all the signals on the PCB itself). If the designer
did a crappy job, you may find that "bandaid" solutions just won't
fix it. Perhaps a USB wireless solution would be a compromise.
Some design companies, have a series of tests they do on a product,
to determine it is fit to ship to customers. One of the tests
is for emissions (signals leaving the PCB, that might violate
FCC part 15) and for susceptibility (signals entering the PCB
from outside). A rule of thumb is, if signals can enter the
board and upset operation, it is also possible that garbage is
being emitted by the product. So you might even see herringbone
patterns on TV sets while that laptop is working.
Regarding FCC part 15, my company was quite paranoid about it. If
a product failed to meet it, it could mean stopped shipments at
the border etc. So it is pretty important to attend to stuff like
that, even if the enforcement system seems lax. No company wants
increased surveillance of their activities.
Paul