WinXP Pro v5.1 SP1 - Windows Explorer file access time

  • Thread starter Thread starter John Pollard
  • Start date Start date
J

John Pollard

In Windows Explorer, all files show time accessed 12:00AM. Does
windows not set this time when files are accessed?
 
Reply-To: "John Pollard" <[email protected]>
From: "John Pollard" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics
Subject: WinXP Pro v5.1 SP1 - Windows Explorer file access time
Lines: 9
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 00:03:37 GMT [snip]
In Windows Explorer, all files show time accessed 12:00AM. Does
windows not set this time when files are accessed?

Check the headers on your message, especially the Date line. Do you have
your system date/time set correctly?
 
Sharon said:
Reply-To: "John Pollard" <[email protected]>
From: "John Pollard" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics
Subject: WinXP Pro v5.1 SP1 - Windows Explorer file access time
Lines: 9
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Message-ID:
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 00:03:37 GMT [snip]
In Windows Explorer, all files show time accessed 12:00AM. Does
windows not set this time when files are accessed?
Check the headers on your message, especially the Date line. Do you
have your system date/time set correctly?

Yes, my system clock is correct. And, I have not modified
system date/time since I posted my question, though I did shut
my computer down overnight. I do not think the date/time was
wrong yesterday either though; I look at it a lot and I have
lots of reminders during the day and they all worked correctly.

But I don't really understand the relationship: if my clock was
wrong - but running - then access times might be wrong ... but
not all say 12:00AM. Am I missing something?

And the problem is ongoing. I just now opened a file with Word,
then exited word. The document showed today as the access date,
but again 12:00AM as the access time. My system time is now
06:56AM.
 
John Pollard wrote:

And the problem is ongoing. I just now opened a file with Word,
then exited word. The document showed today as the access date,
but again 12:00AM as the access time. My system time is now
06:56AM.

Just a little update: I now used WordPad to create a new file,
with the following date/time characteristics.

Date Created: 08/15/2003 08:05am
Date Modified: 08/15/2003 08:05am
Date Accessed: 08/15/2003 12:00am

Very strange.

There is one other thing that *may* be involved, but I can not
remember for certain if it is true, and if it is true, I am not
certain when it happened ... though definitely earlier than
yesterday (08/14/2003). I vaguely remember changing my system
time zone ... I can not remember what (I think) it used to say,
but it now (correctly) says "GMT-08:00 Pacific Time (US &
Canada); Tijuana". And I think that I modified (checked) the
box for "Automatically adjust clock for daylight saving changes.
Could this be involved?
 
Sharon F wrote:

I don't have answer for you yet. Will do some digging in the
Knowledge Base and in the XP resource kit.
If I find anything that helps to
explain this mystery, I'll post back in this thread.

I'm guessing there is no more info available as it's been 5
days. Sure is frustrating; I was just planning to do a little
research that would have used the file access date/time stamp.

Is this something that should get reported to Microsoft as a
possible problem? If so and if I should do it, can you point me
to the right place; I looked at the MS site and the options for
those using OEM versions of Windows did not seem to have any
place to report suspected bugs.
 
Sharon F wrote:



I'm guessing there is no more info available as it's been 5
days. Sure is frustrating; I was just planning to do a little
research that would have used the file access date/time stamp.

Is this something that should get reported to Microsoft as a
possible problem? If so and if I should do it, can you point me
to the right place; I looked at the MS site and the options for
those using OEM versions of Windows did not seem to have any
place to report suspected bugs.

John, I didn't forget you but didn't find anything either. IMO, "Date
Accessed" has never been as reliable of a reference in Windows Explorer as
"Date Modified."

Some folks use alternative file manager tools and seem to like the results.

I don't know if the behavior you've noted is a fault with Explorer or with
the bit that tracks the info. Example if you look at "Date Created," you'll
find a wide variation. Some files will reflect the date the file was
created on your hard drive. Other files will show a date stored internally
(1999 on a brand new 2003 computer).

Sorry I couldn't find anything more for you.
 
Sharon said:
John, I didn't forget you but didn't find anything either. IMO,
"Date Accessed" has never been as reliable of a reference in
Windows Explorer as "Date Modified."

Hi Sharon. I didn't mean to imply I thought you forgot; I know
you said you'd post back if you found something, so I figured no
post meant no info.
Some folks use alternative file manager tools and seem to like the
results.

Are you talking about third party software? Any examples?
I don't know if the behavior you've noted is a fault with Explorer
or with the bit that tracks the info.
Example if you look at "Date
Created," you'll find a wide variation. Some files will reflect the
date the file was created on your hard drive. Other files will show
a date stored internally (1999 on a brand new 2003 computer).

I have seen this too; in other os's as well. I think it is a
philosophical question whether a file copied to your pc from
elsewhere was created the day it was copied or the day it was
created "elsewhere". I can live with those differences. But
date accessed is, in some os's, a very straightforward date,
means just what it says. Indeed, there are jobs/commands on
some systems which do things like purge files that have not been
"accessed" in over a year ... 'course the accessed date best be
correct for this to work.
Sorry I couldn't find anything more for you.

So am I, but thank you for trying.

I am still unclear whether this is something that Microsoft
would be interested in and, if so, how to notify them.
 
Hi Sharon. I didn't mean to imply I thought you forgot; I know
you said you'd post back if you found something, so I figured no
post meant no info.


Are you talking about third party software? Any examples?



I have seen this too; in other os's as well. I think it is a
philosophical question whether a file copied to your pc from
elsewhere was created the day it was copied or the day it was
created "elsewhere". I can live with those differences. But
date accessed is, in some os's, a very straightforward date,
means just what it says. Indeed, there are jobs/commands on
some systems which do things like purge files that have not been
"accessed" in over a year ... 'course the accessed date best be
correct for this to work.


So am I, but thank you for trying.

I am still unclear whether this is something that Microsoft
would be interested in and, if so, how to notify them.


Third party tools: Power Desk and Total Commander (formerly Windows
Commander) that come to mind.

See this link:
http://www.xxcopy.com/xxcopy15.htm

If you scroll down to the definitions for created, accessed, and modified:
you will see that applications as well as the operating system touch this
attribute. This probably explains some of the inconsistencies. (I am not
seeing the same 12AM time stamp that you're seeing though and have no idea
why that is showing up on your system).

There may be some more detailed and technical info about this in the
Technet sections of Microsoft's online documentation. May want to comb
through their archives a bit.

The behavior of the date attributes has been consistent as long as I've
used Windows operating systems (3.x and up). So I would think MS would be
aware of it by now. However, if you'd like to drop them an email about it,
this is the link I would suggest using:

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=http://register.micros
oft.com%2fmswish%2fsuggestion.asp
 
Sharon said:
Third party tools: Power Desk and Total Commander (formerly Windows
Commander) that come to mind.

Thanks, I will check them out.

Did so.
If you scroll down to the definitions for created, accessed, and
modified: you will see that applications as well as the operating
system touch this attribute. This probably explains some of the
inconsistencies. (I am not seeing the same 12AM time stamp that
you're seeing though and have no idea why that is showing up on
your system).

Yes, I see now. How depressing. But at least I have a better
idea where things stand. The 12:00AM time was my only real beef
when I started; maybe I didn't set my sights low enough. :)
There may be some more detailed and technical info about this in the
Technet sections of Microsoft's online documentation. May want to
comb through their archives a bit.
Ok.

The behavior of the date attributes has been consistent as long as
I've used Windows operating systems (3.x and up). So I would think
MS would be aware of it by now. However, if you'd like to drop them
an email about it, this is the link I would suggest using:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=http://register.micros
oft.com%2fmswish%2fsuggestion.asp

Done.

Thank you very much for sticking with this.
 
Since you guys are on the date time problem... Maybe you
can help me. I keep setting my date & time on my system
but It falls behind big time... It's actually showing
August 24, 7:09PM but in fact it's August 28, 9:00AM now.
I have to shut down often cause my computer freezes up if
I don't. I used to leave it running for weeks... Any
Ideas?
-----Original Message-----
access
time
Lines: 9
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Message-ID:
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 00:03:37 GMT [snip]
In Windows Explorer, all files show time accessed
12:00AM.
Check the headers on your message, especially the Date
line.
Do you
have your system date/time set correctly?

Yes, my system clock is correct. And, I have not modified
system date/time since I posted my question, though I did shut
my computer down overnight. I do not think the date/time was
wrong yesterday either though; I look at it a lot and I have
lots of reminders during the day and they all worked correctly.

But I don't really understand the relationship: if my clock was
wrong - but running - then access times might be wrong ... but
not all say 12:00AM. Am I missing something?

And the problem is ongoing. I just now opened a file with Word,
then exited word. The document showed today as the access date,
but again 12:00AM as the access time. My system time is now
06:56AM.

--
John Pollard
j underscore pollard at mindspring dot com
Please reply to newsgroup


.
 
Mario said:
Since you guys are on the date time problem... Maybe you
can help me. I keep setting my date & time on my system
but It falls behind big time... It's actually showing
August 24, 7:09PM but in fact it's August 28, 9:00AM now.
I have to shut down often cause my computer freezes up if
I don't. I used to leave it running for weeks... Any
Ideas?

If the machine loses time when the machine is turned off,
then the likely cause is the battery on the motherboard.

rest of original thread SNIPPED
(BAD 'Mario' for jumping in) :)
 
same problem with 12:30am accessed date on all files

John Pollard said:
In Windows Explorer, all files show time accessed 12:00AM. Does
windows not set this time when files are accessed?
John Pollard
j underscore pollard at mindspring dot com
Please reply to newsgroup
I see that this is a really old message, but I'm getting the exact same thing. All the "data accessed" times on all my files on entire pc are 12:30am in WinXP with all of the updates installed.

I found this thread while using google to try and find some answers to this problem. I was wondering if anyone figured this one out and just never got back here with the answer.

Any help would be very much appreciated.

Thanks,
Tim
 
Back
Top