J
Jane Pitt
I have a strange issue on a 2003 Small Business Server.
The server has two IP addresses in different ranges, 192.168.254.x and
128.0.0.x. All services should be binding to the 192.168.x.x address but
WINS seems to be working from 128.0.x.x. Even if I put both of the server IP
addresses in the WINS servers box on the clients, they cannot browse the
network. Neither can my server browse the network, it says 'the list of
servers in the workgroup was unavailable'.
I can't disable WINS because I have NT clients. My NT clients won't log onto
the domain, I can't create a computer account on the server for them as it
says the username/password is wrong when I enter the admin authentication
details.
I believe this is all linked and all to do with a conflict in WINS but I
don't know how to resolve it. WINS doesn't seem to function properly on
either address range. I suppose one answer is to remove one of the IP
addresses from the server but this has all sorts of other implications.
I replaced an NT server with this 2003 server. The NT server had the same
two IP addresses and everything functioned normally on it.
Has anyone seen this before?
Many thanks,
Jane
The server has two IP addresses in different ranges, 192.168.254.x and
128.0.0.x. All services should be binding to the 192.168.x.x address but
WINS seems to be working from 128.0.x.x. Even if I put both of the server IP
addresses in the WINS servers box on the clients, they cannot browse the
network. Neither can my server browse the network, it says 'the list of
servers in the workgroup was unavailable'.
I can't disable WINS because I have NT clients. My NT clients won't log onto
the domain, I can't create a computer account on the server for them as it
says the username/password is wrong when I enter the admin authentication
details.
I believe this is all linked and all to do with a conflict in WINS but I
don't know how to resolve it. WINS doesn't seem to function properly on
either address range. I suppose one answer is to remove one of the IP
addresses from the server but this has all sorts of other implications.
I replaced an NT server with this 2003 server. The NT server had the same
two IP addresses and everything functioned normally on it.
Has anyone seen this before?
Many thanks,
Jane