WinMgmt warning

  • Thread starter Thread starter Olaf Berli
  • Start date Start date
O

Olaf Berli

I'm installing a Win2000 server SP4 and find a warning in the Application
event log - related to WinMgmt. The ID is 41. The text says: WMI ADAP was
unable to create object index of 2022 for Performance Library MSDTC because
no value was found in the 009 subkey. Initially there were also similar
warnings for NTDS and FileReplicaConn, but I managed to fix these by
applying the workaround outlined in Microsoft Knowledge Base article 266416.
The warning related to MSDTC didn't go away, however. All patches after SP4
have been applied.

Any suggestions how to fix this problem? If not - will it have any effects
on the system to just ignore the message ?

-Olaf-
 
Thanks for the response. As I mentioned in my initial post, I've already
tried the steps in this article without success. It seems - from the event
description - that there may be something missing in one of the ?????009
files. Have no idea, however, how to fix this.

The mentioned article also describes Event ERROR 41, while I'm getting an
Event WARNING.

Any ideas if this warning could just be ignored.....?

-Olaf-

===== Originalmelding fra "Elijah Landreth [MSFT]"
This should be what your looking for.

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;266416

--
Elijah Landreth [MSFT]
Enterprise Platform Support

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Olaf Berli said:
I'm installing a Win2000 server SP4 and find a warning in the Application
event log - related to WinMgmt. The ID is 41. The text says: WMI ADAP was
unable to create object index of 2022 for Performance Library MSDTC because
no value was found in the 009 subkey. Initially there were also similar
warnings for NTDS and FileReplicaConn, but I managed to fix these by
applying the workaround outlined in Microsoft Knowledge Base article 266416.
The warning related to MSDTC didn't go away, however. All patches after SP4
have been applied.

Any suggestions how to fix this problem? If not - will it have any effects
on the system to just ignore the message ?

-Olaf-
 
Back
Top