G
Genna Reeney
Hi folks,
Susan tells me that the decision to add the page about HunterSoft on the
Pricelessware site was made by the group and so any further decisions should
be made by the group.
I have been flooded with the following email in various forms:
*********
Hello ******,
Please remove this page,
http://www.pricelessware.org/2003/huntersoft.htm
Since it is not the fact, you may evaluate our "Unknown Device
Identifier v3.01", which certainly support USB, IEEE1394 and ISA Plug&Play
devices and more... while Unknown Devices v1.2 not.
If you don't remove the SLANDER page in 3 business days, I will
fLoOd your server pricelessware.org and all email accounts on it.
Evil wishes,
Jacques ****
*********
I didn't follow the discussion at the time, though I did just read up on it.
While the practices of this fellow are despicable, I submit it is not the
job of the Pricelessware List to police other sites. We can request sites
that improperly link to the PL to edit their content or we can have an
asterisk by the name to say "not to be confused with X product."
I think the Pricelessware List is better served by steering clear of
controversy; I would prefer to see a short sentence stating that these are 2
different products rather than engage the group and the list into an
unpleasant war of words.
Would love to hear what everyone else thinks.
Susan tells me that the decision to add the page about HunterSoft on the
Pricelessware site was made by the group and so any further decisions should
be made by the group.
I have been flooded with the following email in various forms:
*********
Hello ******,
Please remove this page,
http://www.pricelessware.org/2003/huntersoft.htm
Since it is not the fact, you may evaluate our "Unknown Device
Identifier v3.01", which certainly support USB, IEEE1394 and ISA Plug&Play
devices and more... while Unknown Devices v1.2 not.
If you don't remove the SLANDER page in 3 business days, I will
fLoOd your server pricelessware.org and all email accounts on it.
Evil wishes,
Jacques ****
*********
I didn't follow the discussion at the time, though I did just read up on it.
While the practices of this fellow are despicable, I submit it is not the
job of the Pricelessware List to police other sites. We can request sites
that improperly link to the PL to edit their content or we can have an
asterisk by the name to say "not to be confused with X product."
I think the Pricelessware List is better served by steering clear of
controversy; I would prefer to see a short sentence stating that these are 2
different products rather than engage the group and the list into an
unpleasant war of words.
Would love to hear what everyone else thinks.