And that is why they just get the work done. On the other hand, if they
install something crippled like Ubuntu, they will spend countless hours
trying to figure out cryptic line commands, which inferior Open Source
program to download and possibly use.
In the end, they will ditch Ubuntu and go back to a Windows solution so they
can get some real work done.
Speak for yourself. I spent so much time maintaining Windows that
I looked for an alternative (Mac and Ubuntu came to mind).
When I upgraded to Ubuntu, I had a two-week learning curve (just
as I might had with Windows or Mac), but thereafter it has just
worked. I can spend time working instead of waiting for Vista to
respond or rebooting after crashes.
But that's only my experience...
As for "inferior" Open Source, well, that's a matter of opinion,
isn't it? I know how much more productive both my wife and I are
in OpenOffice than in the new MS Word (even though I was a wiz at
the previous version), but there are others who will disagree
with me, and that's fine.
The thing is, people who like Windows like Windows; people who
like Ubuntu like Ubuntu; and people who like Mac like Mac. And
that's perfectly OK. It's not my job (or yours or Alias's) to
persuade people otherwise.
If someone has a problem with Windows, I'm happy to help (if I
have the answer), even though I personally prefer Ubuntu. After
all, there are couple things that Windows can do that Ubuntu
can't (well, that's what people tell me, anyway).
And think about it... Windows has been a great motivation for
both Mac and Ubuntu to improve, hasn't it? And vice-versa...
I hope that all three continue successfully, far into the future.