Please see below:
Rick Rogers said:
Well, what can i say. I have Vista running on three systems in my household,
all designed and built by me, and none of them has had a single issue with
any USB device, nor did they throughout the majority of the beta testing.
And no, I did not do anything special to any of them, (you designed and built them - that'd be special) I treated them as any
consumer would. <--- a consumer buys and uses, you describe a builder / devloper experience - they're different.
As noted in the link I provided, the majority of USB
problems occur when either hardware or software is added that does not meet
proper specifications or corrupts/alters the installed driver. <--- My 'vista certified' MICROSOFT keyboard and mouse manufactured in MARCH of 2008 don't work. I'm curious as to how hardware built (under license of course) by Microsoft does not meet proper specifications or corrupts / alters the installed driver. Tell me just how a DRIVER "corrupts / alters" itself please.
Remember that when you read forums and help sites, you are only going to
hear of the problems encountered by some. No one comes in to post that they
aren't having any issues. If you read a hundred complaints, recall that
there are already millions of users, (a hundred complaints is representative of THOUSANDS, if not tens of thousands...) which makes the actual percentage very
small, and again many of these can be traced back to adding non-compliant
pieces of hardware and forcing use of XP drivers in a Vista environment. <--- many, but not all. And if not all, why any? AND - the XP and Vista "environments" were built by the same fruity toot tooting company - why would a USER need to be concerned with compliance?!?!?! Why wouldn't the BUILDER worry about compliance?!?!?!?! The builder KNOWS THE ENVIRONMENTS - IT BUILT THEM!
IF MICROSOFT builds XP, and MICROSOFT build Vista - they're the common
denominator! Would a lumber mill start turning out 2x5 studs, and tell the
home owner - I know we built your house, but now we use only 2x5's because
they are better and more secure and more stable than 2x4's. Sigh...
OK - so here are my questions.
IF Vista will search the internet (as it says it does) for the correct
drivers - why doesn't it find them (like I can when I search)? And IF Vista
can KNOW you need to uninstall old / corrupt / incorrect drivers (which many
Microsoft KB articles say a person must do) - why doesn't IT do that? And IF
Vista has found the drivers, uninstalls the old / corrupt / incorrect
drivers, why doesn't in upload and install the correct drivers?
Here's this: if FORD ships a truck with a faulty air flow sensor - THEY
INSTALL THE NEW ONE, UNDER WARRANTY. If they ship lots of trucks, with bad
air flow sensors - THEY ISSUE A RECALL - and THEY FIX IT - even if the
warranty is expired - because it was a manufacturer defect. When I register
the purchase of my "new car" with the manufacturer - they CALL ME and say
"hey, bring in your car so we can update the wingding" - I registered my
Vista - why no message to me "hey, let me remote help a fix for these issues
for you" ?
True - if I install an after-market air flow sensor and break my truck -
it's on me. I put Vista on, according to directions, and NOW my USB drivers
are wrong. But wait - I didn't change the USB drivers - MICROSOFT DID! How
is that MY bad? OK - maybe for a third party plug in, there might be a 'fix'
to be installed - but the MICROSOFT Vista software won't talk to the
MICROSOFT Vista hardware. That means MICROSOFT is on the hook for the fix.
MICROSOFT can dial into my machine, look it over, and fix the air flow
sensor, right?!?! EVERY SINGLE copy of MICROSOFT Vista is REGISTERED. They
know who I am, the serial number of my laptop, the color of my eyes and the
size of my boots! Why on earth do I need to do anything but turn the key and
drive the thing!?!?!?!
If Windows Update can scan my machine for "necessary updates" - why can't
they look at my machine and see I've been having issues - and connect me to a
rep and say "Chris, I see you're having trouble with your USB ports - they're
showing ! next to them, may I help?"
How secure, compliant, up to date, whiz-bang, hi-tech does a mouse have to
be anyway? Why on earth would you CAUSE issues with a build? Why wouldn't
you SOLVE issues with a build?
Update recommends things; Defender scans for issues --- why doesn't the
BUILDER know when something is bonked on my machine, and OFFER some help?
PASSIVE help (we posted a KB about that) is silly in this age of ACTIVE
security, scanning, MARKETING (like on websites), etc. I'm signed in right
this very second - MICROSOFT can (if it wanted too) know every single issue
this machine has had over the last 48 hours, or 48 days, or 48 months!
There's NO NEED for 8000 KB articles, 8000 posts by users and replies by
nutcases, 8000 or 800 or 8 unhappy customers...
I invite (challenge) a MICROSOFT rep to remote help right into this machine
and do right by their stockholders. Hey - if I goofed something up - groovy
- don't freakin' fix it. If YOU goofed something up - fix it! YOU built it,
YOU fix it! Don't tell ME how, I didn't fail to make the things compatible -
YOU DID.
If the construction company orders 40 inch doors, and they built 42 inch
door frames - THEY COME TO THE HOUSE AND FIX IT - I don't run down to Home
Depot, get new doors, and install them. THEY built the incompatibility, THEY
can fix it.
MICROSOFT built XP - the USB ports worked. MICROSOFT built Vista - USB
ports don't work. Only the OS changed. Only the OS builder is responsible
for the fix. Seems pretty straight forward to me...
I truly believe MICROSOFT does GREAT things - this issue, and the poor
resolution there of - is not one of them. Talk about embarassing.
MICROSOFT needs to fix it - MICROSOFT goofed it up. The lack of quality
control in every phase - from conceptualization to rubber meets the road - is
laughable. Those responsible should be fired and hang their heads in shame
and humiliation. To offer to customers a product so rife with issues -
amazingly irresponsible. How very sad for you... you don't have my $, you
have the taxpayers money, in the form of a school district purchase. Shame
on you. Shame indeed!
Chris