Windows Messenger 4.7.3001 vs 5.1

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stefano Ferrante
  • Start date Start date
S

Stefano Ferrante

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello all.

Will you excuse me if this has already been asked but...I am unable to
find out if there could be any reason to switching to Windows Messenger
5.1 from version 4.7.3001.

Assuming I am not prompted to doing it via microsoft update because
there aren't any security updates (do I guess right?) I wonder if I had
better switch to the newest version or keep the windows xp pro default
supplied one.

I hope you will be able solve my doubts :-)

Tia,

Stefano

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.47

iD8DBQFDvPW/tWeA8MqJcFYRAl2mAJ0R1nz+pPh46jOlbyLunYCCYl/aUgCfdkTc
OVs89x1VCdzKI5pZJKnPXpA=
=ZSSC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Mike Hall (MS-MVP) said:
Stefano

Update Messenger to 5.1..
Click to expand...

Well this sounds mandatory :-)
....and makes me think I should follow your advice.

Do you mean I will have new functionality and added security?

I am asking this...also due to some fonts I cannot display and share
with
other users running Msn Messenger (plus?)...but I am more interested in
security features.

Thanks,

Stefano




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.47

iD8DBQFDvUYStWeA8MqJcFYRAsQnAJ9HVdU+16SIA5VnepO8MHZfpHtizgCbBpji
H7lEZT6+fYi/l89P1iOlnaE=
=8Prk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Mike Hall (MS-MVP) said:
WM 5.1 is more secure.. You might want to look at this..

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS05-009.mspx
Click to expand...

I followed your advice. Thank you for your support.

Stefano

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.47

iD8DBQFDvbOctWeA8MqJcFYRAgAYAJ0fMcNaK/KN9oGjopjWA2S4Otq6jQCbBoMj
W5ZGPQUtr3bd4XwTvvo9RXk=
=9CbO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
Back
Top