Windows Is Broken!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

I just want you all to know that you've all been duped.
WIndows is a broken product. When you buy it, it is
incomplete, snd for sll intensive purposes... broken. I
personally am feed up with business practices that
Microsoft employs. I sick of spendinging 90% of my
valuable time trying to make the products that I have
spent my good and hard earned money on to work. I want to
be able to USE these products, not toy with them to get
them to work. Screw this, I'm switching to MAC!
 
Evidentally you can't type very well either - must be an indication of the
true source of your problems.

--
Best of Luck,

Rick Rogers aka "Nutcase" MS-MVP - Win9x
Windows isn't rocket science! That's my other hobby!

Associate Expert - WinXP - Expert Zone
 
maybe someone in india can help?
-----Original Message-----
Evidentally you can't type very well either - must be an indication of the
true source of your problems.

--
Best of Luck,

Rick Rogers aka "Nutcase" MS-MVP - Win9x
Windows isn't rocket science! That's my other hobby!

Associate Expert - WinXP - Expert Zone






.
 
I just want you all to know that you've all been duped.
WIndows is a broken product. When you buy it, it is
incomplete, snd for sll intensive purposes... broken. I
personally am feed up with business practices that
Microsoft employs. I sick of spendinging 90% of my
valuable time trying to make the products that I have
spent my good and hard earned money on to work. I want to
be able to USE these products, not toy with them to get
them to work. Screw this, I'm switching to MAC!

Please be more specific
Where do you think Windows XP is "incomplete" on purchase ?

--
Regards,

Mike
--
Mike Brannigan [Microsoft]

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights

Please note I cannot respond to e-mailed questions, please use these
newsgroups
 
I just want you all to know that you've all been duped.
WIndows is a broken product. When you buy it, it is
incomplete, snd for sll intensive purposes... broken.


Thanks for sharing that. Here I was thinking that everything was
working so well; what a revelation to find that I had been wrong
all the time.
 
Here's a vote for Windows being crap... not at all stable and is not very user friendly...stop kissing a s s , all you computer geeks
 
The computer geeks use BSD, the nerds use Linux.


in message
| Here's a vote for Windows being crap... not at all stable
and is not very user friendly...stop kissing a s s , all you
computer geeks
 
Greetings --

While you're at it, you might want to invest in a couple remedial
English classes. If you can't master elementary (as in grade-school
level) vocabulary, spelling, and grammar issues, I'm not surprised
that you can't cope with a computer. One does need to be functionally
literate to be able to read the Help files, you know.

Bruce Chambers

--
Help us help you:



You can have peace. Or you can have freedom. Don't ever count on
having both at once. -- RAH
 
Can't wait to hop on over to a Mac newsgroup and see what you post there in
a few weeks.

The thing I've personally experienced, and noticed with others who post to
these newsgroups, is that we've all taken a pretty decent operating system
out of the box, downloaded a bunch of crap, tweaked, hard-booted, deleted
stuff we didn't know much about, stood on our heads, crossed our eyes, and
then fussed because things don't work!

Take the OS as it is, learn about it, research, don't tweak until you know
what the heck you're doing and what the results of tweaking are, don't
download junk from the internet until you trust the author and know what the
heck you're doing, don't let your 18 year-old neighbor kid "fix" it for
you...

I think that once you figure out *your* contribution to the problem and
"fix" that, you'll find that XP is actually a pretty stable and reliable OS.

But, what do I know?
~Kimberlee
 
both thumbs up for this post (soor for OT)
way to go, MS.
windows is OK, it has bugs of its own, but it has more features that every
linux system can only dream of.
Windows is a SYSTEM, not a pack of cool software (hi there linux fans)
everything interconnects with everything...that's cool but causes some
problems that a bug can appear in the middle of nowhere, and the solution
may be that it is caused by a misconfiguration in the other side of
nowhere....

way to go MS
 
Andrew Lomakin said:
both thumbs up for this post (soor for OT)
way to go, MS.
windows is OK, it has bugs of its own, but it has more features that every
linux system can only dream of.

Pardon? Troll? Windows does NOT come with free office applications - Linux
(well RH9) DOES. LOADS of them.
name me something that is in Windows and not in Linux (other than security
flaws and virus vulnerability......)

BTW I use both.
 
i use both too, BUT as long as i use linux i don't see a SYSTEM, i see a
bunch of progs :P

there is a system in windows, there's no in linux...there is a lot of
overhead when you use linux, and nearly 0 overhead with windows in a
corporate network i mean..that's about it...no more offtopic for today
 
Andrew Lomakin said:
i use both too, BUT as long as i use linux i don't see a SYSTEM, i see a
bunch of progs :P

there is a system in windows, there's no in linux...there is a lot of
overhead when you use linux, and nearly 0 overhead with windows in a
corporate network i mean..that's about it...no more offtopic for today


well you started it.....what do you mean "windows is a system" - windows is
basically the kernel, which is what Linux is.......
I see no more overhead on my RedHat 9 "system" than I do in my Windows XP
"system"........
 
Andrew Lomakin said:
both thumbs up for this post (soor for OT)
way to go, MS.
windows is OK, it has bugs of its own, but it has more features that every
linux system can only dream of.
Windows is a SYSTEM, not a pack of cool software

In my Windows folder there are *431* .exe files. What is those other than a
bunch of programs?
 
In my Windows folder there are *431* .exe files. What is those other than a
bunch of programs?

I think Rifleman's point is that a functional system is more than the
sum of its parts.

IMO, Windows XP isn't bad enough to be called "broken" (my copy hasn't
crashed yet, but I've only had it for a month) but it certainly has
bugs. Every big software product has bugs. Bigger usually means
buggier, and Windows, from a user's viewpoint, has to be regarded as
monolithic. If something fails, there is little if any indication of
which of those 431 programs threw the error. There is also no choice
but to wait for Microsoft to diagnose and fix it, because nobody else
has the sources.
 
In
Rifleman said:
In my Windows folder there are *431* .exe files. What is those other
than a bunch of programs?


Weren't you the guy who was complaining about "the misuse of
English in public places" a while ago?
 
Ken Blake said:
In


Weren't you the guy who was complaining about "the misuse of
English in public places" a while ago?

Touché!
I bashed that one out in hot blood.......
 
new day, and more of offtopic
windows components are made up in such a way that they form something solid,
and a HUGE pack of linux components is a bunch of bricks tied together with
shoe laces.

that's my impression of both OS's
 
In
Rifleman said:
Touché!
I bashed that one out in hot blood.......



LOL!

It's OK; we all make our share of typos. I sometimes think I'm
the typo-making world champion.
 
Back
Top