R
Robert Davies
This is a partial repost of a thread commenced on November
27 8:15AM, because I have only just made a reply and I
fear that it may not be noticed, as the topic was started
such a long time ago ! I was being assisted by Jow Wu at
Microsoft, and others.
________________________________________________________
Repost commences:
Sorry about the big delay - I've been away for Christmas.
Thanks for all the posts.
I have done as Joe Wu asked and I have the following
results. I have used the single largest folder that I
have accumulated. It is 2 levels below the root of Drive
D (Western Digital 80 GB) and it contains 61 folders and 0
files. However, between them, these 61 sub-folders
contain 224,708 files (all jpeg's) occupying 36.1GB !
To read the folder for the first time, Windows Explorer
takes 3 minutes and 20 seconds in normal mode, 3 minutes
and 50 seconds in safe mode. (I have timed it several
times and these results are repeatable.) Both these
figures are with Explorer in 'List' mode - I rarely need
to use 'Details' mode so I don't know what the timings
would be for that.
I do not have access to another XP machine so I cannot try
the third test in Joe's post. However, I can say that
this disk used to be in a machine running Win98SE and was
formatted FAT32. Its response time with an identical
folder structure and identical numbers of files was almost
instantaneous (which is why I believe that this problem is
NTFS-related). When I got my current machine I stripped
everything off the disk and low-level formatted it to NTFS
so there is no residue that might be affecting its
performance. As I have previously mentioned, Drive D is
used solely for data and there are no system files on it.
Robert
27 8:15AM, because I have only just made a reply and I
fear that it may not be noticed, as the topic was started
such a long time ago ! I was being assisted by Jow Wu at
Microsoft, and others.
________________________________________________________
Repost commences:
Sorry about the big delay - I've been away for Christmas.
Thanks for all the posts.
I have done as Joe Wu asked and I have the following
results. I have used the single largest folder that I
have accumulated. It is 2 levels below the root of Drive
D (Western Digital 80 GB) and it contains 61 folders and 0
files. However, between them, these 61 sub-folders
contain 224,708 files (all jpeg's) occupying 36.1GB !
To read the folder for the first time, Windows Explorer
takes 3 minutes and 20 seconds in normal mode, 3 minutes
and 50 seconds in safe mode. (I have timed it several
times and these results are repeatable.) Both these
figures are with Explorer in 'List' mode - I rarely need
to use 'Details' mode so I don't know what the timings
would be for that.
I do not have access to another XP machine so I cannot try
the third test in Joe's post. However, I can say that
this disk used to be in a machine running Win98SE and was
formatted FAT32. Its response time with an identical
folder structure and identical numbers of files was almost
instantaneous (which is why I believe that this problem is
NTFS-related). When I got my current machine I stripped
everything off the disk and low-level formatted it to NTFS
so there is no residue that might be affecting its
performance. As I have previously mentioned, Drive D is
used solely for data and there are no system files on it.
Robert
-----Original Message-----
confers no rights.-----Original Message-----
Hello,
Thank you for your posts.
Actually, the system is expected to spend a bit longer than normal to list
a large number of objects in a folder. If possible, I would like to suggest
that you classify these image files to more subfolders.
In the meantime, please help me check the following:
1. Please go into Safe Mode (Restart computer, press the F8 key when the
boot menu pops up, select [Safe Mode], and boot up) and check if the issue
still occurs.
2. Please change the view mode to "Lists" and check how fast the files are
displayed.
3. If possible, please connect this hard disk to another Windows XP machine
and check how well it works.
Thanks for your time and cooperation.
Regards,
Joe Wu
Product Support Services
Microsoft Corporation
Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
====================================================
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
====================================================
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and