windows 2000 professional

  • Thread starter Thread starter denaca
  • Start date Start date
D

denaca

Presently my system is running on Windows98. I've been
asking people about to what Windows i might upgade.
One persons suggested XP and another suggested 2000 Pro.
It was also suggested that i not simply upgrade over my
current Windows98 but backup my files and format the disk
before loading, say, Windows2K. Now, i really wasn't
looking to spend all this time reloading software and
doing all the tweeking again. So, anyone have an opinion
about the upgrade proceedures?
Thanks
 
There are pros and cons for upgrading vs. fresh install. You don't want to
spend the extra time reloading and tweaking the software. That is one of the
cons of a fresh install.

Try upgrading and see what you end up with. If everything turns out OK,
leave it alone. If things don't then format and reinstall. (But then you
wasted your time doing the "upgrade")

Personally I would not take the chance of wasting the time upgrading only to
find it didn't work. You might end up doing more work than if you had done a
fresh install in the first place.

Of course backup everything before an upgrade or a fresh install.

hth
DDS W 2k MVP MCSE
 
Greetings --

Personally, at this point in time, I'd choose WinXP. WinXP is the
newer OS, and it supports more hardware and software than does Win2K,
and it will be supported longer by Microsoft.

Have you made sure that your PC's hardware components are capable
of supporting either or both Win2K and WinXP? This information will
be found at the PC's manufacturer's web site, and on Microsoft's
Hardware Compatibility List:
(http://www.microsoft.com/hcl/default.asp) Additionally, download
and run Microsoft WinXP Upgrade Advisor to see if you have any
WinXP-incompatible hardware components or applications.

You should, before proceeding, take a few minutes to ensure that
there are Win2K and/or WinXP device drivers available for all of the
machine's components. There may not be, if the PC was specifically
designed for Win98/Me. Also bear in mind that PCs designed for, and
that were sold and run fine with, Win9x/Me very often do not meet
Win2K's or WinXP's much more stringent hardware quality requirements.
This is particularly true of many models in Compaq's consumer-class
Presario product line or HP's consumer-class Pavilion product line.
Win2K and WinXP, like WinNT before them, are quite sensitive to
marginally defective or sub-standard (iow, poor quality) hardware
(particularly motherboards, RAM and hard drives) that will still
support Win9x/Me.

In either case, you can get by easily enough with buying the
Upgrade license, as it's possible to perform a clean installation
using an Upgrade CD, should you so desire. If you choose Win2K, I'd
recommend the clean installation, rather than an in-place upgrade. If
you want to perform an in-place upgrade to WinXP, Microsoft has
greatly improved (over earlier versions of Windows) WinXP's ability to
smoothly upgrade an earlier OS. WinXP is designed to install and
upgrade the existing operating system while simultaneously preserving
your applications and data, and translating as many personalized
settings as possible. The process is designed to be, and normally is,
quite painless. That said, things can go wrong, in a small number of
cases. If your data is at all important to you, back it up before
proceeding.

HOW TO Prepare to Upgrade Win98 or WinMe
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q316639

Also, if you choose WinXP, you'll need to decide upon which
specific edition, WinXP Home or WinXP Pro. The two versions are
_identical_ when it comes to performance, stability, and device driver
and software application compatibility, but are intended to meet
different functionality, networking, security, and ease-of-use needs,
in different environments. The most significant differences are that
WinXP Pro allows up to 10 simultaneous inbound network connections
while WinXP Home only allows only 5, WinXP Pro is designed to join a
Microsoft domain while WinXP Home cannot, and only WinXP Pro supports
file encryption and IIS.

Windows XP Comparison Guide
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/home/howtobuy/choosing2.asp

Which Edition Is Right for You
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/whichxp.asp

Windows XP Home Edition vs. Professional Edition
http://www.winsupersite.com/showcase/windowsxp_home_pro.asp

Which is "better?" That depends entirely upon the uses to which
you put your computer, the network environment in which you'll operate
it, your specific security needs, and your level of computer
knowledge. The links above should help you decide.


Bruce Chambers

--
Help us help you:



You can have peace. Or you can have freedom. Don't ever count on
having both at once. -- RAH
 
Presently my system is running on Windows98. I've been
asking people about to what Windows i might upgade.
One persons suggested XP and another suggested 2000 Pro.
It was also suggested that i not simply upgrade over my
current Windows98 but backup my files and format the disk
before loading, say, Windows2K. Now, i really wasn't
looking to spend all this time reloading software and
doing all the tweeking again. So, anyone have an opinion
about the upgrade proceedures?

You need to tell us about your computer:

1) How Much RAM?
2) What speed/type CPU?
3) How much FREE drive space?
4) What do you use your computer for?

For a typical conversion I would STRONGLY suggest that you use the
complete WIPE/REINSTALL method - this will clean up a lot of things on
your computer, remove any gotcha's and give you a better running system.

Here are the spec's I use for the different OS's:

Win 2000 or XP Prof (never use HOME):
1) RAM, Start at 256MB and go up, it's a hungry OS
2) CPU, Celeron 1.X+ Ghz min, P4 2.0+ Ghz for real work
3) HD, 40GB min, more if you are doing work

With XP you can adjust performance and get rid of all the eye-candy CPU
cycles stealing crap and gain about 30% increase in performance.

Just make sure that you buy a 7200 RPM drive or faster, those cheap 5400
RPM drives just plain suck.
 
Back
Top