Conor said:
No, what it does mean is that I have common sense.
....but the OP asked about himself (or users in general) not
about whether or not you think *you* have need for Linux
AV software. The fact that you think that you don't have
any use for AV with Linux indicates to me that you have
much less clue than you believe that you do.
The fact is that even in Windows, an e-mail attachment must
be converted into an executable file before it is executed. The
fact that most Windows users have an e-mail client that makes
the process easier (catering to the laziness of their userbase)
doesn't really have as much to do with the OS as it does with
the applications that the user uses.
With more and more clueless Linux users entering the userbase,
how long do you think it will be before most of them opt for
applications that cater to their laziness? How many of them will
be running applications that are unsafe securitywise and not even
open source (as the Linux purists would prefer that everything be
done).
THat's why the only
time I've ever had an infected computer was back in 1994 when I
knowingly ran something from a dodgy site that could have been
infected.
I have never had an infection or infestation on my internet ready
computer ~ I have other computers for that stuff.
It is possible to run Windows without AV also, but I wouldn't
recommend that anyone who needs to ask, do so. Plus, if you
bring any executables onboard ~ they should be scanned for
malware after a suitable cooling off period. AV scanners are
better equipped for this function than your average user with
a hex editor, disassembler, and/or decompiler.