G
Graham
I've found that other thing that returns the assembly
executable but I don't need the file tacked on to the
path, just need the path. I don't want to always have to
write code to trim off the filename either...
Also, none of my friends want to try my new programs out
because they don't want to put the .NET framework on
their pc. I was reading that you guys killed the need for
runtime files with this version, so what exactly is
the .NET framework download that everyone needs to use my
programs?
Finally I am concerned about speed. I was led to believe
that .NET was so much faster then VB6. Yet, the install
took almost eternity, the programs I write in .NET load
slower as well as run operations significantly slower.
I'm sure the probelm is on my end but not sure where. My
only guess at this point is that I need to be running
Windows Server 2003 and so does everyone who wants to use
my programs and actually benefit from them. Could that be
the problem?
executable but I don't need the file tacked on to the
path, just need the path. I don't want to always have to
write code to trim off the filename either...
Also, none of my friends want to try my new programs out
because they don't want to put the .NET framework on
their pc. I was reading that you guys killed the need for
runtime files with this version, so what exactly is
the .NET framework download that everyone needs to use my
programs?
Finally I am concerned about speed. I was led to believe
that .NET was so much faster then VB6. Yet, the install
took almost eternity, the programs I write in .NET load
slower as well as run operations significantly slower.
I'm sure the probelm is on my end but not sure where. My
only guess at this point is that I need to be running
Windows Server 2003 and so does everyone who wants to use
my programs and actually benefit from them. Could that be
the problem?