Why is the Hard Drive called "C" by default?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ComputerTechGeek
  • Start date Start date
C

ComputerTechGeek

Is there a historical/technical reason why the Hard Drive called "C" by
default? Why is it not called "A" (since it is the primary mass storage
device on many computer configurations)? What about the "B" drive? Just
curious about this.....

Thanks in advance
 
Is there a historical/technical reason why the Hard Drive called "C" by
default? Why is it not called "A" (since it is the primary mass storage
device on many computer configurations)? What about the "B" drive? Just
curious about this.....

Thanks in advance
Click to expand...
Short answer: Historical
Long answer: The first Personal Computers had a single floppy drive (Drive
"A").
Users booted from a floppy disk, popped that disk out and inserted a floppy
disk which contained the computer program that the user desired to use.
Some people wanted to keep their data on a floppy disk "other" than the
"program" disk. They grew tired of the "floppy disk shuffle" and put a
second floppy drive into their computers, ("Drive "B").
Well after hard disks became ubiquitous in PCs, the floppy disk began
transitioning from size 5 1/4" to size 3 1/2" . For several years during
that transition phase, many people required a floppy drive of each size in
order to access older programs/data on the old size disks and their new
programs on the new size disks.
Steve
 
You call that historical? How old are you? You know there were floppy
disks before 5 1/4" disks?

Anyway, yes A and B were used for floppy drives. As of about 10 years ago,
all computers came with 3.5" drives, many with 2 3.5" drives for easy
copying of one floppy disk to another, and they were starting to get CD
drives at the same time. So the CD drives ended up being called E or F if
you had 2 hard drives. Now that we can write to CDs and even DVDs, we don't
really use 3.5" disks anymore. So hard drives still start at C, CD drives
still start at E/F, and A and B are generally not used in new computers.
 
Try this

http://inventors.about.com/library/weekly/aa031599.htm

"The first IBM PC ran on a 4.77 MHz Intel 8088 microprocessor. The PC
came equipped with 16 kilobytes of memory, expandable to 256k. The PC
came with one or two 160k floppy disk drives and an optional color monitor."


You call that historical? How old are you? You know there were floppy
disks before 5 1/4" disks?

Anyway, yes A and B were used for floppy drives. As of about 10 years ago,
all computers came with 3.5" drives, many with 2 3.5" drives for easy
copying of one floppy disk to another, and they were starting to get CD
drives at the same time. So the CD drives ended up being called E or F if
you had 2 hard drives. Now that we can write to CDs and even DVDs, we don't
really use 3.5" disks anymore. So hard drives still start at C, CD drives
still start at E/F, and A and B are generally not used in new computers.



Short answer: Historical
Long answer: The first Personal Computers had a single floppy drive (Drive
"A").
Users booted from a floppy disk, popped that disk out and inserted a
floppy disk which contained the computer program that the user desired to
use.
Some people wanted to keep their data on a floppy disk "other" than the
"program" disk. They grew tired of the "floppy disk shuffle" and put a
second floppy drive into their computers, ("Drive "B").
Well after hard disks became ubiquitous in PCs, the floppy disk began
transitioning from size 5 1/4" to size 3 1/2" . For several years during
that transition phase, many people required a floppy drive of each size in
order to access older programs/data on the old size disks and their new
programs on the new size disks.
Steve
Click to expand...
[/QUOTE]
 
Is there a historical/technical reason why the Hard Drive called "C" by
default? Why is it not called "A" (since it is the primary mass storage
device on many computer configurations)? What about the "B" drive? Just
curious about this.....

Thanks in advance
Click to expand...

Before bootable CD drives came along, floppy drives were provided with
letters A and B. Now, either the bootable CD or floppy may take A.

The next sequential letter is C. This is usually the first active, primary
partition found on a hard drive. Its also dependent on the
active/primary/logical partition hierarchy scheme system. Its possible to
boot from floppy or CD, and a logical partition may take drive letter C, if
no primary partitions exist for instance.

Originally, PCs had no hard drives. They ran on big oversize floppies. B
designation came later, and was commonly used as a data diskette. The hard
drive came along, and logically, its partition took the letter C.

A cd drive can take the letter C, if no detectible hard drive partition
exists. Designating a latter letter for the cd drive with driver modifier
is the typical solution used. This is only seen with floppy boot media like
a 98 startup diskette for instance. The former can be seen, under the right
conditions, with a simple boot diskette.

Magneto floppies (if not bootable), pen drives, CD/DVD and so forth follow a
letter hierarchy specific to windows. And in some cases, can be modified by
the user. With the advent of XP, even more latitude is provided for drive
letter changes by the user.
 
Is there a historical/technical reason why the Hard Drive called "C" by
default? Why is it not called "A" (since it is the primary mass storage
device on many computer configurations)? What about the "B" drive? Just
curious about this.....

Thanks in advance
Click to expand...

Because in the old days there were usually two floppies.
 
True - and prior to THAT there were the Altair and the Imsai 8080 using the
8080 chip. Input on the IMSAI was via 16 paddle switches on the front.
Output was via the LED's - 16 of them. You input and read data two bytes at
a time. BTW, those 160k floppy's were 8" discs. I developed the firmware for
the first double density controller - got a whopping 320k out of an 8"
floppy.
 
Vic said:
True - and prior to THAT there were the Altair and the Imsai 8080
using the 8080 chip. Input on the IMSAI was via 16 paddle switches on
the front. Output was via the LED's - 16 of them. You input and read
data two bytes at a time.
Click to expand...
BTW, those 160k floppy's were 8" discs. I
Click to expand...

Wrong! The floppies on the original IBM PC were 5.25" 160kB
The 8" floppies are from a earlier era
 
Thomas Wendell said:
Wrong! The floppies on the original IBM PC were 5.25" 160kB
The 8" floppies are from a earlier era
Click to expand...

IBM used 8inch disks on their "DisplayWriter" word processors, but the
first IBM PC that landed in our office in around 1983 was 5-1/4. It was a
disgraceful piece of engineering by standards of the day.

Bear in mind that 8086 processors were being shipped in 1978/9 and the 486
AN's were about in 83/84 it was a stone age piece of kit.

Steve

Steve
 
IBM used 8inch disks on their "DisplayWriter" word processors, but the
first IBM PC that landed in our office in around 1983 was 5-1/4. It was a
disgraceful piece of engineering by standards of the day.

Bear in mind that 8086 processors were being shipped in 1978/9 and the 486
AN's were about in 83/84 it was a stone age piece of kit.
Click to expand...

Not quite correct. Intel released the first 80486 models in 1989.

In 1983/84 the highest performing x86 processor from Intel was the
80286. The 80386 was first marketed in 1986.

Ron Martell Duncan B.C. Canada
--
Microsoft MVP (1997 - 2006)
On-Line Help Computer Service
http://onlinehelp.bc.ca
Syberfix Remote Computer Repair

"Anyone who thinks that they are too small to make a difference
has never been in bed with a mosquito."
 
Ron Martell said:
Not quite correct. Intel released the first 80486 models in 1989.

In 1983/84 the highest performing x86 processor from Intel was the
80286. The 80386 was first marketed in 1986.
Click to expand...

I think his point was that the processors were mature when they finally went
into PCs. IIRC the issues at the time were chipsets, which were very
expensive and complicated to design and produce...thus the 386sx...a 386
that ran on a 286 chipset.

-John O
 
I think his point was that the processors were mature when they finally went
into PCs. IIRC the issues at the time were chipsets, which were very
expensive and complicated to design and produce...thus the 386sx...a 386
that ran on a 286 chipset.

-John O
Click to expand...

Intel may have waited a few months for supporting chipsets to be
developed but not much more than that. The first functioning models
of the 80486 were not even developed in the Intel labs until 1988 at
the earliest.

As for the 386SX my recollection was that it was more a case of
motherboard design and RAM quantity than the supporting chipset. 0286
motherboard designs were readily adaptable to the 386sx, and the 16
bit data path meant that only two 30 pin SIMMs were needed rather than
the four required by the 32 bit data path in the full 80386. That was
a big factor for the laptop manufacturers in particular, as the extra
SIMM sockets meant increased size and weight which are major concerns
with laptop design.

Ron Martell Duncan B.C. Canada
--
Microsoft MVP (1997 - 2006)
On-Line Help Computer Service
http://onlinehelp.bc.ca
Syberfix Remote Computer Repair

"Anyone who thinks that they are too small to make a difference
has never been in bed with a mosquito."
 
Back
Top